Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Webcompat comments have no styles for list items. #588

Closed
karlcow opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Webcompat comments have no styles for list items. #588

karlcow opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@karlcow
Copy link
Member

karlcow commented Mar 10, 2015

Lists are difficult to read because they are not styled.

capture d ecran 2015-03-10 a 10 35 21

@miketaylr
Copy link
Member

http://staging.webcompat.com/issues/252 is an example of this. We have the correct li structure, just missing a useful style for it.

magsout added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2015
miketaylr pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2015
* master: (46 commits)
  Fixes #509 - mention [ci skip] in docs.
  v1.6.2 changelog
  Issues #588 - list style
  Fix #583 Using the function for checking dependencies
  Checking dependencies
  Modules needed for checking dependencies
  Two cases to handle
  Adding message
  Issue #368 - Remove (now) unused STARTUP variable
  Issue #368 - Compute cache busting param based on md5 hash of file
  Issue #368 - Move bust_cache function into a Jinja template helper
  Issue #368: Part 1, add bust_cache param to minified production JS
  Issue #587 - Add a task to check npm dependencies and run by default
  v1.6.1
  Fixes #591 - Typo in form field. >_<
  Tag v1.6.0
  Issue #572 - Remove right float for GitHub issue warp hint
  Issue #432 - Add js-form-error and js-no-error classes and update tests.
  Issue #432 - Add wc-Form-required class to problem label
  Added wc-Form, wc-ReportForm
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants