ci(docker): Fix workflow trigger from tag to main branch push #233
Conversation
|
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions Docker workflow configuration in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker.yml (1)
44-44: Consider adding a tag for main branch builds.While restricting the
latesttag to releases is a good practice, consider adding a specific tag for main branch builds (e.g.,edge,nightly, ormain) to easily identify and track these builds.Add this tag configuration:
type=semver,pattern={{version}} type=semver,pattern={{major}} type=semver,pattern={{major}}.{{minor}} type=raw,value=latest,enable=${{ github.event_name == 'release' }} + type=raw,value=edge,enable=${{ github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/docker.yml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/docker.yml (2)
Line range hint 1-70: Verify impact on existing automation.
The switch from tag-based to branch-based triggers is a significant change. Please ensure that:
- Any existing CI/CD pipelines or scripts that depend on Docker images are updated
- Documentation is updated to reflect the new triggering mechanism
Let's check for potential dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Let's check the content of README.md and other workflow files to understand the dependencies:
Docker workflow changes are safe to proceed
After analyzing the codebase, I can confirm that:
- The Docker image usage in README.md doesn't specify tags and uses the default
latesttag, which will continue to work as expected. - No other workflow files depend on the Docker image or its tags.
- The Homebrew workflow is triggered only on release creation, which aligns with the new Docker workflow's release trigger.
The switch from tag-based to branch-based triggers with additional path filters is a safe improvement that won't break existing automation or documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for references to Docker image tags in the codebase
# Search for Docker image references
echo "Checking for Docker image references:"
rg -l "ghcr.io/yamadashy/repomix" --type yaml --type markdown
# Check for CI/CD files that might need updates
echo "Checking other workflow files for dependencies:"
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/
Length of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check README.md for Docker image usage instructions
echo "=== README.md Docker image references ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "ghcr.io/yamadashy/repomix" README.md
# Check other workflow files for potential dependencies
echo -e "\n=== Checking workflow files for Docker image usage ==="
for file in .github/workflows/*.yml; do
if [ "$file" != ".github/workflows/docker.yml" ]; then
echo -e "\n--- $file ---"
cat "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 7396
5-9: LGTM! Workflow trigger changes look good.
The changes align well with the PR objective:
- Switching to main branch trigger is implemented correctly
- Paths-ignore for documentation files is a good optimization
Let's verify no critical Docker-related files are accidentally excluded:
✅ Verification successful
Paths-ignore configuration is safe and well-configured
The verification confirms that the paths-ignore configuration is appropriate:
- All critical Docker-related files (Dockerfile, .dockerignore) will still trigger the workflow
- Configuration files that may affect Docker builds (package.json, biome.json) are not ignored
- Only documentation files (*.md) and LICENSE are excluded, which is correct as they don't affect the Docker build
The ignored markdown files (README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) contain Docker-related content but are purely documentation, so excluding them from triggering builds is an appropriate optimization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no Docker-related files match the ignore patterns
# Check if any Docker-related files would be excluded
echo "Checking for Docker-related files that might be excluded..."
fd -e md -e LICENSE | grep -iE 'docker|container|image|build'
# List all Docker-related files for reference
echo "Docker-related files in repository:"
fd -e dockerfile -e dockerignore
Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive check using ripgrep to find all Docker-related files
# and verify if any of them would be excluded by the paths-ignore patterns
# First, let's find all Docker-related files
echo "All Docker-related files and configurations:"
rg -l -i "docker|container|image|build" --type-add 'docker:*.{dockerfile,dockerignore}' --type docker --type yaml --type json
# Now, let's specifically look at the workflow file to understand the complete paths-ignore
echo -e "\nWorkflow paths-ignore configuration:"
rg "paths-ignore:" -A 5 .github/workflows/docker.yml
# Check for any Docker documentation that would be ignored
echo -e "\nDocker-related markdown files that would be ignored:"
fd -e md | xargs rg -l -i "docker|container|image|build"
Length of output: 758
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #233 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.16% 92.16%
=======================================
Files 44 44
Lines 2080 2080
Branches 458 458
=======================================
Hits 1917 1917
Misses 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![standard-input[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1011034?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
#221 (comment)
Checklist
npm run testnpm run lint