Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make init package idempotent #751

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022
Merged

Make init package idempotent #751

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

jeff-mccoy
Copy link
Contributor

@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy commented Sep 20, 2022

Description

This PR resolves issues with re-running zarf init on an existing zarf cluster. Specifically, it resolves an issue with the injector not excluding itself from the mutating webhook and also the seed registry not using persistence causing issues with upgrades.

@Racer159
Copy link
Contributor

@jeff-mccoy @JasonvanBrackel @YrrepNoj thoughts on splitting the test for this into its own task under #774? If we get this in where we can run double inits we could add a new ci workflow for handling upgrade testing.

@jeff-mccoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Racer159 I'm totally fine with that

@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy closed this Sep 26, 2022
@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy reopened this Sep 26, 2022
@jeff-mccoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops. lol

@JasonvanBrackel
Copy link
Contributor

Agree with @Racer159. Fine with that

@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2022 21:07
Copy link
Contributor

@Racer159 Racer159 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. Will need #774 eventually

@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy merged commit c2e6bcd into master Sep 27, 2022
@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
@bdfinst bdfinst deleted the idempotent-init branch January 12, 2023 22:32
Noxsios pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants