Icu4c 66.1

[pOmelchenko]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

---

Updated icu4c and all dependent formulas.

P.S.: I hope that on second try I will made all right ☺️

[pOmelchenko]

Who can help with solving problems? I was think I made all correct but CI failed and now I don't understand what happens

[Bo98]

These still need revision bumping:

• gjs
• ncmpcpp
• vte3

[pOmelchenko]

These still need revision bumping:

• gjs
• ncmpcpp
• vte3

Thx! But why? I don't see relations with icu4c

[Bo98]

The CI detected that the current bottles are linking against icu4c (via brew linkage --test). It is likely the case that icu4c is there as a dependency of another dependency. Arguably there should be a depends_on "icu4c" there to be more implicit, but no one noticed since it was being pulled in as a dependency anyway.

For example, ncmpcpp depends on boost which depends on icu4c. icu4c is therefore a dependency of ncmpcpp because boost needs it, but ncmpcpp happens to also actually use icu4c directly.

[pOmelchenko]

I'm understood, thank you

[pOmelchenko]

Guys, I need help, again. I'm right in my mind about dependents? If I run that command brew uses icu4c --recursive I got full list of packages which I must bumping for correct building?

I'm not sure but I got list of 450+ names. It's really correct?

[Bo98]

No you don't need to revision bump every single one. In some cases, you might not even need to do every one at the first level brew uses. The best way really is to see what the CI says.

It looks like you've covered everything, but it's just that some of them, like mapnik, have compile errors. See #48349 for a previous attempt. It looks like not much has changed since.

[SMillerDev]

Mapnik had a release since then. Updating a release is preferable over version bumping