Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Optimize flamechart][2/4] Replace Speedscope types with custom stack frame type #91

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2020

Conversation

taneliang
Copy link
Member

@taneliang taneliang commented Jul 28, 2020

Stack PR by STACK ATTACK:

Summary

Lays groundwork for #75 by reducing the flamechart data passed around
the app.

Was also intended to help #50 by moving some division operations from
the hot render loops into preprocessFlamechart, but any performance
gains are negligible.

Test Plan

  • yarn flow: no errors in modified code
  • yarn lint
  • yarn start: no performance difference
  • yarn test: tests updated and passing

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 28, 2020

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/mlh-fellowship/scheduling-profiler-prototype/i4j06hzrd
✅ Preview: https://scheduling-profiler-prototype-git-0f8a7-2.mlh-fellowship.vercel.app

Base automatically changed from 0f8a7-1 to master July 28, 2020 16:03
@taneliang taneliang changed the base branch from master to eliang/fix-tests July 29, 2020 03:36
Base automatically changed from eliang/fix-tests to master July 29, 2020 06:39
… frame type

Lays groundwork for #75 by reducing the flamechart data passed around
the app.

Was also intended to help #50 by moving some division operations from
the hot render loops into preprocessFlamechart, but any performance
gains are negligible.

* `yarn flow`: no errors in modified code
* `yarn lint`
* `yarn start`: no performance difference
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants