Testnets #122
Testnets #122
Conversation
fix: nextjs cache access forbidden
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request primarily focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx (3)
Line range hint 214-270: Enhance type safety in vouch preparation logic.
The prepareVouchData function handles complex chain selection logic but could benefit from improved type safety.
Consider these improvements:
- const voucherEvidenceChain = supportedChains.find(
- (chain) =>
- rawVoucher[chain.id].claimer &&
- rawVoucher[chain.id].claimer?.registration?.humanity.winnerClaim,
- );
+ const voucherEvidenceChain = supportedChains.find(
+ (chain) =>
+ rawVoucher[chain.id]?.claimer &&
+ rawVoucher[chain.id]?.claimer?.registration?.humanity?.winnerClaim,
+ );
- out.name = rawVoucher[relevantChain.id].claimer?.name;
- out.voucher = rawVoucher[relevantChain.id].claimer?.id;
- out.pohId = rawVoucher[relevantChain.id].claimer?.registration?.humanity.id;
+ const relevantClaimer = rawVoucher[relevantChain.id]?.claimer;
+ out.name = relevantClaimer?.name;
+ out.voucher = relevantClaimer?.id;
+ out.pohId = relevantClaimer?.registration?.humanity?.id;Line range hint 283-293: Improve error handling for policy link fetching.
The current error handling silently fails and returns null, which could make debugging difficult in production.
Consider adding error logging and retry mechanism:
const policyLink = await (async () => {
+ const MAX_RETRIES = 3;
+ let attempts = 0;
try {
- return (
+ while (attempts < MAX_RETRIES) {
+ try {
+ return (
await Promise.resolve(
ipfsFetch<MetaEvidenceFile>(
request.arbitratorHistory.registrationMeta,
),
- )
- ).fileURI;
+ )
+ ).fileURI;
+ } catch (e) {
+ attempts++;
+ if (attempts === MAX_RETRIES) throw e;
+ await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000 * attempts));
+ }
+ }
} catch (e) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch policy link:', e);
return null;
}
})();Line range hint 1-577: Consider component decomposition for better maintainability.
The Request component has grown complex with multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components.
Suggested improvements:
-
Extract these logical units into separate components:
- RegistrationDetails
- RevocationDetails
- VouchList
- PolicyInformation
-
Move data fetching logic into custom hooks:
// hooks/useRequestData.ts
export function useRequestData(chain: Chain, pohId: string, requestId: string) {
// Extract request data fetching logic
}
// hooks/useVouchData.ts
export function useVouchData(vouches: Array<Vouch>) {
// Extract vouch preparation logic
}- Consider using CSS modules instead of inline styles for better maintainability:
import styles from './Request.module.css';
// Replace inline styles like:
- className="text-orange mb-8 md:hidden"
+ className={styles.lastUpdate}📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Vouch.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Vouch.tsx (1)
54-54: LGTM! Necessary for IPFS content integrity.
The addition of unoptimized={true} is appropriate here since the image source is from IPFS. This prevents Next.js's image optimization from potentially interfering with IPFS content addressing.
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx (1)
319-319: Verify the necessity of disabling image optimization.
Setting unoptimized={true} disables Next.js's built-in Image Optimization API, which could impact performance and loading times. This might lead to larger image file sizes being served to users.
Please confirm if this change is necessary due to:
- Issues with the Image Optimization API
- Requirements for serving original images
- External image source constraints
If none of these apply, consider removing the unoptimized prop to leverage Next.js's built-in optimization.
Also applies to: 395-395
| width={64} | ||
| height={64} | ||
| unoptimized={true} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now generate the final response:
IPFS image security measures needed for Vouch component
The current implementation lacks content verification for IPFS images:
- No IPFS hash validation before rendering
- No content-type verification for images
- No error handling for failed image loads
- No error boundaries around the image component
Recommended changes:
- Wrap the Image component in an ErrorBoundary (already available in the codebase at
src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx) - Add onError handler to gracefully handle image load failures
- Add IPFS hash validation before rendering
- Implement content-type verification for the IPFS gateway response
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding content verification for IPFS images.
When loading content from IPFS, it's recommended to implement additional security measures:
- Validate IPFS hashes before rendering
- Consider implementing a content-type check
- Add error boundaries to handle failed loads gracefully
Let's check if there are any existing security measures for IPFS content:
Let me gather more information about how IPFS images are handled in the codebase.
Let me check for any error handling specifically around the Image component in the Vouch component.
Let me check how images are handled in the parent components and if there's any global error handling for images.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for IPFS-related security measures in the codebase
echo "Searching for IPFS validation logic..."
rg -l "ipfs.*validate|validateIpfs|ipfs.*check"
echo "Checking the IPFS utility implementation..."
cat utils/ipfs.ts 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for IPFS image handling patterns
echo "Searching for IPFS image handling..."
rg -A 5 "ipfs"
echo "Looking for Image component usage with IPFS..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Image $$$'
echo "Checking for error handling around images..."
rg -A 5 "onError.*Image|Image.*onError"
Length of output: 24480
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for error handling in Vouch component and related image components
echo "Checking Vouch component implementation..."
cat src/components/Vouch.tsx
echo "Checking for any Image component wrappers or HOCs..."
rg -l "Image.*wrap|wrap.*Image"
echo "Checking for any error boundaries in the component hierarchy..."
rg -A 5 "ErrorBoundary|onError"
Length of output: 11248
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for global image handling and parent components
echo "Checking app layout and parent components..."
cat src/app/layout.tsx
echo "Checking for any global error handling or image components..."
rg -A 5 "next/image|onError.*image|image.*onError"
echo "Checking for any image validation utilities..."
rg -A 5 "validateImage|checkImage|verifyImage"
Length of output: 6895
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor