Testnets #130
Testnets #130
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/Evidence.tsx (4)
Line range hint
108-124: Centralize loading state management.The loading state updates are scattered across different callbacks. Consider centralizing them in a try-catch block.
const [prepare] = usePoHWrite( "submitEvidence", useMemo<Effects>( () => ({ onReady(fire) { fire(); toast.info("Transaction pending"); }, - onError() { - loading.stop(); + onError(error) { toast.error("Transaction rejected"); + throw error; // Propagate error for central handling }, onSuccess() { - loading.stop(); toast.success("Request created"); }, }), [loading], ), );
Line range hint
136-149: Add validation and error handling to evidence submission.The evidence submission lacks input validation and proper error handling.
Consider adding these improvements:
const submit = async () => { + if (!title.trim()) { + toast.error("Title is required"); + return; + } loading.start(); + try { const data = new FormData(); data.append("###", "evidence.json"); data.append("name", title); if (description) data.append("description", description); if (file) data.append("evidence", file, file.name); state$.uri.set(await uploadToIPFS(data)); + } catch (error) { + loading.stop(); + toast.error("Failed to upload evidence"); + console.error(error); + } }; state$.onChange(({ value }) => { if (!value.uri) return; + try { prepare({ args: [pohId, BigInt(requestIndex), value.uri] }); + } catch (error) { + loading.stop(); + toast.error("Failed to prepare transaction"); + console.error(error); + } });
Line range hint
158-172: Improve loading state feedback in UI.The button state doesn't fully reflect the loading state during evidence submission.
<button - disabled={isEvidenceDisabled} + disabled={isEvidenceDisabled || pending} onClick={() => setModalOpen(true)} - className="btn-main mx-2 mt-2 w-48 self-end" + className={`btn-main mx-2 mt-2 w-48 self-end ${ + pending ? 'opacity-50 cursor-not-allowed' : '' + }`} > - Add evidence + {pending ? 'Processing...' : 'Add evidence'} </button>
Line range hint
193-206: Add security measures for file uploads and user input.The current implementation lacks important security measures for handling file uploads and user input.
Consider implementing these security measures:
- Add file size limits
- Validate file types
- Sanitize user inputs before submission
<Uploader className="bg-whiteBackgroundWithOpacity text-primaryText flex w-full justify-center rounded-sm p-2 outline-dotted outline-white" type="all" + maxSize={5 * 1024 * 1024} // 5MB limit + accept={{ + 'application/pdf': ['.pdf'], + 'image/*': ['.png', '.jpg', '.jpeg'], + 'text/plain': ['.txt'] + }} onDrop={(acceptedFiles) => setFile(acceptedFiles[0])} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/Evidence.tsx(7 hunks)src/types/docs.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/types/docs.ts (1)
5-5: Clarify the distinction between evidence and fileURI properties.
The interface now has two seemingly similar string properties for URIs:
fileURI?: stringevidence?: string
This could lead to confusion about when to use which property. Consider either:
- Adding documentation to clarify the distinct purposes of these properties, or
- Consolidating them if they serve the same purpose.
Additionally, consider maintaining consistent naming conventions - if one property uses the URI suffix, perhaps the new property should follow suit (e.g., evidenceURI).
Let's check how these properties are used in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since I have enough context about how these properties are used in the codebase:
The evidence and fileURI properties serve different purposes and should be kept distinct
Looking at the usage in Evidence.tsx, these properties provide fallback behavior:
const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI
? evidence?.fileURI
: evidence?.evidencefileURIis used for uploaded files (e.g., attachments, registration files)evidenceis used for direct evidence content/links
The naming is actually appropriate since they serve different purposes - fileURI specifically points to uploaded files while evidence is a more generic property for other types of evidence references.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of both properties to understand their distinct purposes
echo "Searching for fileURI usage:"
rg "fileURI" -A 2 -B 2
echo -e "\nSearching for evidence property usage:"
rg "evidence[^a-zA-Z]" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 38935
| const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI | ||
| ? evidence?.fileURI | ||
| : evidence?.evidence | ||
| ? evidence?.evidence | ||
| : undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the ipfsUri resolution logic.
The current nested ternary can be simplified for better readability.
- const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI
- ? evidence?.fileURI
- : evidence?.evidence
- ? evidence?.evidence
- : undefined;
+ const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI || evidence?.evidence;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI | |
| ? evidence?.fileURI | |
| : evidence?.evidence | |
| ? evidence?.evidence | |
| : undefined; | |
| const ipfsUri = evidence?.fileURI || evidence?.evidence; |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Attachmentcomponent for displaying evidence links.Bug Fixes
Documentation
EvidenceFileinterface to include an optionalevidenceproperty.