Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XLS-40: DID Specification #136

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

XLS-40: DID Specification #136

merged 31 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

aanchal4
Copy link
Contributor

@aanchal4 aanchal4 commented Sep 29, 2023

@aanchal4 aanchal4 changed the title XLS-40 XLS-40: DID Specification Sep 29, 2023
@shortthefomo
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe I'm just reading it wrong by why is the id of the did not present in the account_objects response? Also the delete I don't see a parameter to delete by id...

Forgive me if wrong viewing this on mobile.

XLS-30 can be found here: XRPLF#125
@mvadari
Copy link
Collaborator

mvadari commented Oct 6, 2023

Maybe I'm just reading it wrong by why is the id of the did not present in the account_objects response?

It looks like @aanchal4 just wrote an overly simplified version of what account_objects returns (note that the request doesn't even include an account param) - the actual response will contain all the usual fields.

Also the delete I don't see a parameter to delete by id...

A user can only hold one DID object. So no ID is needed - you're just deleting the one object they have.

XLS-40/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
XLS-40/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
XLS-40/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
XLS-40/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@intelliot intelliot dismissed Silkjaer’s stale review October 17, 2023 00:23

folder naming has been updated

@intelliot intelliot requested a review from mvadari October 17, 2023 04:43
@intelliot
Copy link
Collaborator

@mvadari @sappenin - can you connect with @aanchal4 if your comments haven't been addressed?

- Edit Create txn condition
- Remove `Note` on txn conditions from the DID object section.
@sappenin
Copy link
Collaborator

@Silkjaer can you take another look here? This has pretty broad approval otherwise.

aanchal4 and others added 2 commits October 18, 2023 12:11
- Updated the recommended read method to `ledger_entry` as it is more efficient vs `account_object`method. Note that both methods for `DID` object retrieval are supported.
@intelliot
Copy link
Collaborator

note: @aanchal4 confirmed this should be ready to merge

@intelliot intelliot merged commit c4a86cb into XRPLF:master Oct 18, 2023
ckniffen pushed a commit to XRPLF/xrpl.js that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2023
…om rippled code (#2491)

Add support for XLS-40 and adds a script to automatically
generate transaction models from rippled source code.

### Context of Change

XRPLF/XRPL-Standards#136
XRPLF/rippled#4636
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants