-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Survey sanity checks #137
Comments
@AteZenmo @GillisHommen punt van aandacht: wat zijn de minimale inputs die we nodig hebben om een bedrijf te accepteren (jaarverbruik, opwek, en aansluitcapaciteit) of is aanlsuitcapaciteit niet per se nodig? |
I would put the upper limit much lower, at 100k, and the lower limit also lower, at something like 5k or even less.
For these two:
I understood 'holes' are defined as extended periods with a delivery of production of 0kWh per timestep? I don't think checking for 0.0 is really a way to identify 'missing data'. Basically all timeseries data should be complete (valid doubles) and it is the responsibility of Energieke Regio to make sure the data is correct or at least feasible. We can do checks on the sum and the min/max values of a timeseries though.
FeedIn can be zero despite having PV; it just means all the production is consumed directly, and not fed back into the grid. Instead you can check that quater-hourly production should not be all zeroes if hasPv is true.
For companies with a battery system this is not necessarily true. (but so far we have had no companies with a battery system) |
I think for some of the points we can have "severity one" and "severity two" thresholds.
Done.
Changed it to max 150 kW for now.
Changed it to "total power of charge points should be below contracted delivery capacity + battery power"
I think it deserves a warning as I find it unlikely they'll check the entire time series.
I've removed this check.
I'm not sure if we should assume a production meter is always present.
Changed it to "every time step in quarter-hourly feed-in should be be less than or equal to production + battery power" |
if kleinverbruikOrGrootverbruik is Grootverbruik includes Grootverbruik data |
Additional check:
This will help detect when people fill in 'Watt-peak' in the field where they should fill in kiloWatt-peak. Buildings with more than 5000kW (5MW) PV on the roof are extremely rare, as good as non-existent, while almost any PV installation has more than 5kW (which would be 5000W, if it is filled in incorrectly). Failing this check should lead to a 'hard reject' of the data; this is the most basic sanity check that Energieke Regio should do (but still often miss). We should not accept the data if they missed this superbasic thing. |
(Future) additional check :
-> Prevents to much solar installed aswell. |
When the gridconnection has PV and quarter hourly production data and installed PV kWp (pvInstalledKwp), we can estimate the total sum of the list (around 900 hours of peak production in a year) = soort profiel |
hasPV comes from electricity.hasConnection or supply.hasSupply? |
In module "Zummon" add sanity checks and
Sanity checks
Capacities and annual totals:
Booleans:
Quarter-hourly data:
quarter-hourly feed-in should not be all zeroes if hasPv is trueBest IDE to use is https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: