-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Revert "fix: re-enable cypress checks" #32045
Conversation
This reverts commit b12f515.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
Category | Issue | Fix Detected |
---|---|---|
Parallel Test Synchronization Issue ▹ view |
Files scanned
File Path | Reviewed |
---|---|
scripts/cypress_run.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ❌ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
f"--browser {browser} " | ||
f"--record --group {group_id} --tag {REPO},{GITHUB_EVENT_NAME} " | ||
f"--ci-build-id {build_id} " | ||
f"--wait-for-missing-groups " | ||
f"-- {chrome_flags}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parallel Test Synchronization Issue
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Removing the '--wait-for-missing-groups' flag in parallel Cypress test execution could lead to test runs completing before all parallel groups are ready, potentially missing test failures in other groups.
Why this matters
In a CI environment with parallel test execution, not waiting for all groups can result in false positives where the build is marked as successful even if other parallel groups later fail.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Retain the '--wait-for-missing-groups' flag to ensure proper synchronization between parallel test groups:
f"--browser {browser} "
f"--record --group {group_id} --tag {REPO},{GITHUB_EVENT_NAME} "
f"--ci-build-id {build_id} "
f"--wait-for-missing-groups "
f"-- {chrome_flags}"
💬 Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Reverts #32008