Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve lighthouse support #192

Closed
ataffanel opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve lighthouse support #192

ataffanel opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@ataffanel
Copy link
Member

In order to better support the lighthouse system from the lib, there needs to be more utility functions implemented to get and set geometry and calibrations data.

Lets use this ticket to groups commits that adds better support to the Lighthouse system.

krichardsson added a commit to bitcraze/crazyflie-clients-python that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2021
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2021
…m the crazyflie firmware tools to the python lib
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2021
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2021
…ons. Clear callback before calling it to enable registration of new callback from called code
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2021
Re-wrote read_lighthouse_mem.py and write_lighthouse_mem.py to use the LighthouseMemHelper class
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2021
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2021
…ghthouse system configuration data to the Crazyflie
@jonasdn
Copy link
Contributor

jonasdn commented Mar 17, 2021

When should this issue be considered done? Does anyone have a nice metric?

@whoenig
Copy link
Contributor

whoenig commented Mar 17, 2021

I think we can close this once we released with Lighthouse support and removed the early-access tag from the webpage for the Lighthouse deck.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants