-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Format all files on BE with perttier config #978
Conversation
verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), | ||
deleteChecks | ||
); | ||
router.delete("/:monitorId", verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), deleteChecks); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High
a database access
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 3 months ago
To fix the problem, we will add rate limiting to the Express router using the express-rate-limit
package. This will ensure that the number of requests to the route is controlled, preventing potential abuse. We will set up a rate limiter with a reasonable limit, such as 100 requests per 15 minutes, and apply it to the routes that perform database access.
- Install the
express-rate-limit
package. - Import the
express-rate-limit
package in theServer/routes/checkRoute.js
file. - Set up a rate limiter with a configuration that limits the number of requests.
- Apply the rate limiter to the routes that perform database access.
-
Copy modified line R2 -
Copy modified lines R17-R21 -
Copy modified lines R23-R25 -
Copy modified line R27 -
Copy modified lines R29-R31
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | ||
import { Router } from "express"; | ||
import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; | ||
import { | ||
@@ -15,11 +16,17 @@ | ||
|
||
router.get("/:monitorId", getChecks); | ||
router.post("/:monitorId", verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), createCheck); | ||
router.delete("/:monitorId", verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), deleteChecks); | ||
// Set up rate limiter: maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes | ||
const limiter = rateLimit({ | ||
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes | ||
max: 100, // max 100 requests per windowMs | ||
}); | ||
|
||
router.get("/team/:teamId", getTeamChecks); | ||
router.get("/:monitorId", limiter, getChecks); | ||
router.post("/:monitorId", limiter, verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), createCheck); | ||
router.delete("/:monitorId", limiter, verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), deleteChecks); | ||
|
||
router.delete("/team/:teamId", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), deleteChecksByTeamId); | ||
router.get("/team/:teamId", limiter, getTeamChecks); | ||
|
||
router.put("/team/ttl", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), updateChecksTTL); | ||
router.delete("/team/:teamId", limiter, isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), deleteChecksByTeamId); | ||
|
||
router.put("/team/ttl", limiter, isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), updateChecksTTL); | ||
|
-
Copy modified lines R34-R35
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ | ||
"swagger-ui-express": "5.0.1", | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0" | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0", | ||
"express-rate-limit": "^7.4.1" | ||
}, |
Package | Version | Security advisories |
express-rate-limit (npm) | 7.4.1 | None |
isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), | ||
deleteChecksByTeamId | ||
); | ||
router.delete("/team/:teamId", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), deleteChecksByTeamId); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High
authorization
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 3 months ago
To fix the problem, we will introduce rate limiting to the route handler that performs authorization. We will use the express-rate-limit
package to set up a rate limiter and apply it to the specific route. This will ensure that the route is protected against excessive requests, mitigating the risk of DoS attacks.
- Install the
express-rate-limit
package if it is not already installed. - Import the
express-rate-limit
package in theServer/routes/checkRoute.js
file. - Set up a rate limiter with appropriate configuration (e.g., a maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes).
- Apply the rate limiter to the route handler on line 22.
-
Copy modified line R2 -
Copy modified lines R17-R22 -
Copy modified line R29
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | ||
import { Router } from "express"; | ||
import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; | ||
import { | ||
@@ -15,2 +16,8 @@ | ||
|
||
// Set up rate limiter: maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes | ||
const limiter = rateLimit({ | ||
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes | ||
max: 100, // max 100 requests per windowMs | ||
}); | ||
|
||
router.get("/:monitorId", getChecks); | ||
@@ -21,3 +28,3 @@ | ||
|
||
router.delete("/team/:teamId", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), deleteChecksByTeamId); | ||
router.delete("/team/:teamId", limiter, isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), deleteChecksByTeamId); | ||
|
-
Copy modified lines R34-R35
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ | ||
"swagger-ui-express": "5.0.1", | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0" | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0", | ||
"express-rate-limit": "^7.4.1" | ||
}, |
Package | Version | Security advisories |
express-rate-limit (npm) | 7.4.1 | None |
verifyJWT, | ||
issueInvitation | ||
); | ||
router.post("/", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), verifyJWT, issueInvitation); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High
authorization
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 3 months ago
To fix the problem, we will introduce rate limiting to the routes in Server/routes/inviteRoute.js
. We will use the express-rate-limit
package to limit the number of requests that can be made to the endpoints within a specified time window. This will help mitigate the risk of denial-of-service attacks.
- Install the
express-rate-limit
package if it is not already installed. - Import the
express-rate-limit
package in theServer/routes/inviteRoute.js
file. - Set up a rate limiter with appropriate configuration (e.g., maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes).
- Apply the rate limiter to the routes that require protection.
-
Copy modified line R4 -
Copy modified lines R12-R19
@@ -3,2 +3,3 @@ | ||
import { isAllowed } from "../middleware/isAllowed.js"; | ||
import RateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; | ||
import { | ||
@@ -10,4 +11,10 @@ | ||
|
||
router.post("/", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), verifyJWT, issueInvitation); | ||
router.post("/verify", issueInvitation); | ||
// set up rate limiter: maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes | ||
const limiter = RateLimit({ | ||
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes | ||
max: 100, // max 100 requests per windowMs | ||
}); | ||
|
||
router.post("/", limiter, isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), verifyJWT, issueInvitation); | ||
router.post("/verify", limiter, issueInvitation); | ||
|
-
Copy modified lines R34-R35
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ | ||
"swagger-ui-express": "5.0.1", | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0" | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0", | ||
"express-rate-limit": "^7.4.1" | ||
}, |
Package | Version | Security advisories |
express-rate-limit (npm) | 7.4.1 | None |
verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), | ||
getMaintenanceWindowsByMonitorId | ||
"/monitor/:monitorId", | ||
verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High
a database access
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 3 months ago
To fix the problem, we will use the express-rate-limit
package to add rate limiting to the routes in Server/routes/maintenanceWindowRoute.js
. This will ensure that the number of requests to these routes is limited, thereby reducing the risk of a DoS attack.
- Install the
express-rate-limit
package if it is not already installed. - Import the
express-rate-limit
package in theServer/routes/maintenanceWindowRoute.js
file. - Set up a rate limiter with appropriate configuration (e.g., maximum of 100 requests per 15 minutes).
- Apply the rate limiter to the routes that perform database operations.
-
Copy modified line R2 -
Copy modified lines R16-R20 -
Copy modified line R25 -
Copy modified line R30 -
Copy modified line R32 -
Copy modified line R34 -
Copy modified line R36
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | ||
import { Router } from "express"; | ||
import RateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; | ||
import { | ||
@@ -14,2 +15,7 @@ | ||
|
||
const limiter = RateLimit({ | ||
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes | ||
max: 100, // max 100 requests per windowMs | ||
}); | ||
|
||
router.post("/", createMaintenanceWindows); | ||
@@ -18,2 +24,3 @@ | ||
"/monitor/:monitorId", | ||
limiter, | ||
verifyOwnership(Monitor, "monitorId"), | ||
@@ -22,9 +29,9 @@ | ||
|
||
router.get("/team/", getMaintenanceWindowsByTeamId); | ||
router.get("/team/", limiter, getMaintenanceWindowsByTeamId); | ||
|
||
router.get("/:id", getMaintenanceWindowById); | ||
router.get("/:id", limiter, getMaintenanceWindowById); | ||
|
||
router.put("/:id", editMaintenanceWindow); | ||
router.put("/:id", limiter, editMaintenanceWindow); | ||
|
||
router.delete("/:id", deleteMaintenanceWindow); | ||
router.delete("/:id", limiter, deleteMaintenanceWindow); | ||
|
-
Copy modified lines R34-R35
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ | ||
"swagger-ui-express": "5.0.1", | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0" | ||
"winston": "^3.13.0", | ||
"express-rate-limit": "^7.4.1" | ||
}, |
Package | Version | Security advisories |
express-rate-limit (npm) | 7.4.1 | None |
id: "123", | ||
}, | ||
headers: { | ||
authorization: "Bearer token", |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Hard-coded credentials Critical test
authorization header
params: {}, | ||
query: {}, | ||
headers: { | ||
authorization: "Bearer token", |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Hard-coded credentials Critical test
authorization header
}, | ||
query: {}, | ||
headers: { | ||
authorization: "Bearer token", |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Hard-coded credentials Critical test
authorization header
}, | ||
query: {}, | ||
headers: { | ||
authorization: "Bearer token", |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Hard-coded credentials Critical test
authorization header
}, | ||
query: {}, | ||
headers: { | ||
authorization: "Bearer token", |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Hard-coded credentials Critical test
authorization header
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve formatting adjustments across numerous files, primarily transitioning from spaces to tabs for indentation. This effort aims to enhance code readability and maintain consistency without altering the logical structure or functionality of the code. Noteworthy updates include a property name change in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (57)
- .prettierrc (1 hunks)
- Server/configs/db.js (1 hunks)
- Server/controllers/checkController.js (2 hunks)
- Server/controllers/inviteController.js (2 hunks)
- Server/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.js (2 hunks)
- Server/controllers/queueController.js (1 hunks)
- Server/controllers/settingsController.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/FakeDb.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/AppSettings.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/Check.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/InviteToken.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/MaintenanceWindow.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/Monitor.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/Notification.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/PageSpeedCheck.js (3 hunks)
- Server/db/models/RecoveryToken.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/models/Team.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js (2 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (5 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/inviteModule.js (3 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/maintenanceWindowModule.js (6 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js (16 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/notificationModule.js (2 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js (3 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/recoveryModule.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/settingsModule.js (1 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/modules/userModule.js (5 hunks)
- Server/middleware/handleErrors.js (1 hunks)
- Server/middleware/isAllowed.js (1 hunks)
- Server/middleware/verifyJWT.js (1 hunks)
- Server/middleware/verifyOwnership.js (1 hunks)
- Server/middleware/verifySuperAdmin.js (1 hunks)
- Server/routes/checkRoute.js (2 hunks)
- Server/routes/inviteRoute.js (1 hunks)
- Server/routes/maintenanceWindowRoute.js (2 hunks)
- Server/routes/queueRoute.js (1 hunks)
- Server/routes/settingsRoute.js (1 hunks)
- Server/service/emailService.js (1 hunks)
- Server/service/jobQueue.js (2 hunks)
- Server/service/networkService.js (1 hunks)
- Server/service/settingsService.js (2 hunks)
- Server/templates/employeeActivation.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/templates/noIncidentsThisWeek.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/templates/passwordReset.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/templates/serverIsDown.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/templates/serverIsUp.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/templates/welcomeEmail.mjml (1 hunks)
- Server/tests/controllers/checkController.test.js (1 hunks)
- Server/tests/controllers/inviteController.test.js (1 hunks)
- Server/tests/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.test.js (1 hunks)
- Server/tests/controllers/queueController.test.js (1 hunks)
- Server/tests/controllers/settingsController.test.js (1 hunks)
- Server/utils/demoMonitors.json (1 hunks)
- Server/utils/imageProcessing.js (1 hunks)
- Server/utils/logger.js (1 hunks)
- Server/utils/messages.js (1 hunks)
- Server/validation/joi.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (41)
- .prettierrc
- Server/configs/db.js
- Server/controllers/checkController.js
- Server/controllers/inviteController.js
- Server/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.js
- Server/controllers/queueController.js
- Server/db/models/AppSettings.js
- Server/db/models/Check.js
- Server/db/models/InviteToken.js
- Server/db/models/MaintenanceWindow.js
- Server/db/models/Monitor.js
- Server/db/models/Notification.js
- Server/db/models/PageSpeedCheck.js
- Server/db/models/RecoveryToken.js
- Server/db/models/Team.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/inviteModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/maintenanceWindowModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/notificationModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/recoveryModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/settingsModule.js
- Server/db/mongo/modules/userModule.js
- Server/middleware/handleErrors.js
- Server/middleware/isAllowed.js
- Server/middleware/verifyJWT.js
- Server/middleware/verifyOwnership.js
- Server/middleware/verifySuperAdmin.js
- Server/routes/queueRoute.js
- Server/routes/settingsRoute.js
- Server/service/emailService.js
- Server/templates/employeeActivation.mjml
- Server/templates/noIncidentsThisWeek.mjml
- Server/templates/passwordReset.mjml
- Server/templates/serverIsDown.mjml
- Server/templates/serverIsUp.mjml
- Server/templates/welcomeEmail.mjml
- Server/tests/controllers/queueController.test.js
- Server/tests/controllers/settingsController.test.js
- Server/utils/logger.js
- Server/validation/joi.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
Server/controllers/settingsController.js
[error] 9-9: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 31-31: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
Server/db/FakeDb.js
[error] 45-45: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 48-48: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 109-109: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js
[error] 36-36: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
[error] 51-51: The update clause in this loop moves the variable in the wrong direction.
(lint/correctness/useValidForDirection)
[error] 134-134: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Server/service/jobQueue.js
[error] 60-60: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 61-61: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 145-145: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 146-146: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 222-222: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 223-223: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 239-239: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 240-240: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 266-266: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 267-267: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 298-298: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 299-299: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 352-352: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 353-353: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Server/service/networkService.js
[error] 103-103: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 104-104: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Server/service/settingsService.js
[error] 60-60: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 61-61: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Server/utils/imageProcessing.js
[error] 21-21: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Server/utils/messages.js
[error] 87-87: This property value named QUEUE_GET_METRICS is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.
Overwritten with this value.
If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named QUEUE_GET_METRICS(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
Server/routes/checkRoute.js
[failure] 18-18: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs a database access, but is not rate-limited.
[failure] 22-22: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.Server/routes/inviteRoute.js
[failure] 11-11: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.Server/routes/maintenanceWindowRoute.js
[failure] 19-19: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs a database access, but is not rate-limited.Server/tests/controllers/checkController.test.js
[failure] 314-314: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.Server/tests/controllers/inviteController.test.js
[failure] 12-12: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.Server/tests/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.test.js
[failure] 27-27: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
[failure] 115-115: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
[failure] 166-166: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
[failure] 235-235: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
[failure] 295-295: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
[failure] 354-354: Hard-coded credentials
The hard-coded value "Bearer token" is used as authorization header.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Server/routes/inviteRoute.js (2)
5-6
: Yo, these imports are lookin' fresh!The formatting change here is on point, switching from spaces to tabs. It's all part of the grand plan to make our code look as clean as mom's spaghetti.
11-11
: This route's got more swagger than Eminem in 8 Mile!The formatting change here is tighter than skinny jeans, consolidating the route definition into one line. It's cleaner than a fresh pair of Jordans.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 11-11: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.Server/utils/demoMonitors.json (2)
1-1270
: Yo, this JSON's lookin' fresh, dawg!Aight, check it out, homie. The indentation's switched up from spaces to tabs, and it's all consistent-like. That's what's up with that new Prettier config, ya feel me? The structure's still solid, no syntax slip-ups or nothin'. We good.
1-1270
: Whoa, hold up! This list got a major overhaul, fam!Yo, peep this, my dude. The whole squad of demo monitors got swapped out! We still rollin' with 253 entries, but the lineup's different now. It's like mom's spaghetti, but with websites, you know what I'm sayin'? Make sure this new crew's what you wanted, 'cause it's a whole new ball game now.
You wanna double-check if this update was intentional? Here's a script to compare the old and new lists:
Run this and make sure you're cool with the changes, a'ight?
router.post("/", isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), verifyJWT, issueInvitation); | ||
router.post("/verify", issueInvitation); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yo, we need to drop some sick beats... I mean, rate limits on these routes!
Listen up, homie! We've got a situation here that's making me more nervous than standing on stage at the rap battle. Both these routes are wide open like mom's spaghetti on a plate - no rate limiting! That's like leaving the mic on all night, ya feel me?
For the "/" route, we're checking if the user's allowed and verifying their JWT, but we're not putting any brakes on how often they can hit this endpoint. Same goes for the "/verify" route - it's as open as Eminem's vocabulary.
We gotta add some rate limiting middleware to these routes faster than you can say "lose yourself". It'll help us prevent any wannabe hackers from trying to DoS our system or abuse these endpoints.
You want me to spit some code to implement rate limiting? I can drop some bars... I mean, write some middleware to handle this. Just say the word, and I'll open up a new GitHub issue to track this task. We'll make these routes tighter than Eminem's rhymes!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 11-11: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This PR formats all fiels on the with the new prettier configuration to give us a common baseline