-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: bolt-relay changes #10
Conversation
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @thedevbirb and the rest of your teammates on Graphite |
mev-boost-relay/README.md
Outdated
@@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ redis-cli DEL boost-relay/sepolia:validators-registration boost-relay/sepolia:va | |||
* `FORCE_GET_HEADER_204` - force 204 as getHeader response | |||
* `ENABLE_IGNORABLE_VALIDATION_ERRORS` - enable ignorable validation errors | |||
* `USE_V1_PUBLISH_BLOCK_ENDPOINT` - uses the v1 publish block endpoint on the beacon node | |||
* `USE_SSZ_ENCODING_PUBLISH_BLOCK` - uses the SSZ encoding for the publish block endpoint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did we get rid of SSZ encoding?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is a mistake. The new endpoint /relay/v1/builder/blocks_with_preconfs
to submit block bids with proofs doesn't support SSZ yet (need to document it!) to move faster with the PoC; however I don't remember a reason to avoid ssz encoding while publishing... @merklefruit wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah if the published type didn't change, no reason to have this removed. Probably a typo left in from an old attempt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. We should restore it and test if something breaks with our other changes to the relay
c5389e2
to
ce5dd22
Compare
refactor to comply to specs + SSZ enc/dec of spec types
No description provided.