Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: bolt-relay changes #10

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

feat: bolt-relay changes #10

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

thedevbirb
Copy link
Contributor

@thedevbirb thedevbirb commented Apr 29, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor Author

thedevbirb commented Apr 29, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @thedevbirb and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ redis-cli DEL boost-relay/sepolia:validators-registration boost-relay/sepolia:va
* `FORCE_GET_HEADER_204` - force 204 as getHeader response
* `ENABLE_IGNORABLE_VALIDATION_ERRORS` - enable ignorable validation errors
* `USE_V1_PUBLISH_BLOCK_ENDPOINT` - uses the v1 publish block endpoint on the beacon node
* `USE_SSZ_ENCODING_PUBLISH_BLOCK` - uses the SSZ encoding for the publish block endpoint
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did we get rid of SSZ encoding?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is a mistake. The new endpoint /relay/v1/builder/blocks_with_preconfs to submit block bids with proofs doesn't support SSZ yet (need to document it!) to move faster with the PoC; however I don't remember a reason to avoid ssz encoding while publishing... @merklefruit wdyt?

Copy link
Collaborator

@merklefruit merklefruit Apr 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah if the published type didn't change, no reason to have this removed. Probably a typo left in from an old attempt?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@thedevbirb thedevbirb Apr 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. We should restore it and test if something breaks with our other changes to the relay

@thedevbirb thedevbirb changed the base branch from feat/bolt-builder-gt to unstable June 5, 2024 08:49
@thedevbirb thedevbirb marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2024 08:50
@merklefruit merklefruit merged commit 2cd9a92 into unstable Jun 5, 2024
@merklefruit merklefruit deleted the feat/bolt-relay-gt branch June 5, 2024 09:16
@merklefruit merklefruit restored the feat/bolt-relay-gt branch June 5, 2024 09:16
@merklefruit merklefruit deleted the feat/bolt-relay-gt branch July 4, 2024 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants