-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2275 - Org Model view only message and tooltip fixes - [AB] #2894
#2275 - Org Model view only message and tooltip fixes - [AB] #2894
Conversation
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
@CocoByte Since we won't have "member permissions" rolled out before people see this message ... can you remove the third sentence for now? (We'll need to adjust the message again after admins are incorporated into the system.) Therefore, it should read:
|
…w-only-and-tooltip-fixes
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
1 similar comment
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
NOTE: You're linking to another PR instead of the ticket at the top of your PR description |
width: 70vw; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NITPICK: endline
NOTE: Code is no longer on NL. Deploy it somewhere else for the design review. |
Fantastic work. |
Co-authored-by: Rachid Mrad <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rachid Mrad <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rachid Mrad <[email protected]>
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
1 similar comment
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox nl. |
Ticket 2275
Resolves #2275
Changes
Context for reviewers
NOTE @rachidatecs -- I remember you mentioning that it is preferable to use
<span>
within the tooltip. However, using a<span>
instead of a<div>
(or other containers) causes conflicts in positioning.<span>
is getting handled differently and while I can see how using<span>
would be the more minimal solution (especially for text content),<div>
I think is more extensible/robust. Perhaps I could add<span>
within the<div>
to keep text within appropriate containers...but this would assume purely text-based content (what if we wanted HTML instead?). And since making assumptions in code is also breaking best practices, I opted to just use a<div>
for simplicity and extensibility.Setup
Code Review Verification Steps
As the original developer, I have
Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards
Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)
Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)
As a code reviewer, I have
Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes
Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)
Validated user-facing changes as a developer
New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
Checked keyboard navigability
Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product
Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)
(Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist
As a designer reviewer, I have
Verified that the changes match the design intention
Validated user-facing changes as a designer
Checked keyboard navigability
Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)
(Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Screenshots