idl: Fix using address constraint with field expressions
#3034
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@acheroncrypto is attempting to deploy a commit to the coral-xyz Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
acheroncrypto
added
idl
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Using
address = <ACCOUNT>.<FIELD>does not compile with the current IDL generation as explained in #2912.Summary of changes
Skip including
addressfield in the IDL if field access expression is being used with theaddress constraint.Note that using
has_oneshould be preferred (like I mentioned in #2912 (comment)) as it also supports automatic resolution.Resolves #2912