Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should big cubes have numbers in them? #13

Closed
jfly opened this issue Oct 4, 2015 · 31 comments
Closed

Should big cubes have numbers in them? #13

jfly opened this issue Oct 4, 2015 · 31 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jfly
Copy link
Member

jfly commented Oct 4, 2015

Has this been discussed before? They are kind of hard to differentiate right now. @lgarron, I feel like you'd have an opinion here.

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 4, 2017

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 4, 2017 via email

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 4, 2017

eh I see no harm in adding them in, but we'll see.
what do you mean the negative space? you want me to invert the image colors?

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 4, 2017

yeah I was thinking to the effect of (but done properly)
image . But actually this looks kind of bad so nvm.

maybe instead something just off centered would work better for the 6 and 7 like (look very zoomed out)

image

image

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 4, 2017

ooo those all look cool
the negative thing seems like a cool idea but it doesn't seem to look that good
i personally wouldn't prefer the 7 and the 6 to be like that in the corner (too small) but thats just my preference

figured out how to make the 7 not look off, the latter is meh though; its inconsistent compared to 4-6

https://i.gyazo.com/33a77fa1f4c667f84dba48eafa0eb33c.png this seems like a simple fix for 7
I was also thinking of a diagonal thing like this but i cant seem to "latch" onto the corners of the squares to connect the lines required for it accurately https://i.gyazo.com/dae2153a2692f2209b311ed56fabe3de.png

@jfly would you be willing to add in the icons i've proposed (but with this for 7: https://i.gyazo.com/33a77fa1f4c667f84dba48eafa0eb33c.png )

I would need to add do 4bld and 5bld but those should be easy

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 4, 2017

Yeah that 7 looks better. Still overall for 4-5 I don't really see the point and would prefer to avoid them (if enough people think otherwise then could merge them assuming there were suitable 4bld and 5bld changes) and for 6 it's kind of too lopsided.

If other people have opinions would be good to hear.

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 5, 2017

yeah the 6 looks a bit unnatural; I tried this: https://i.gyazo.com/d49ce64ffabc4396570bf946799f7976.png
looks worse imo and doesn't seem to fix it lol, so I guess we'll keep the 6 as it is

also I believe there is a point to having the 4-5, on the registration list on the wca for example, the icons are small so it would be quite beneficial to make them have numbers (see what 4-7 look on registration lists on wca website right now) https://i.gyazo.com/1d66e4cf420d9175c2fe44a7fa8f2714.png

anyways, I am hoping these changes I have proposed can be added, let me know what you guys think

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 5, 2017

Wait I'm not sure where it looks like that they are much larger for me when I check registration pages. Do you use <100% scale on your web browser?

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 5, 2017

no i use 100 percent scale on my web browser
this is the webpage
https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/competitions/ImaginaliaOpen2017/registrations
and this is what it looks like for me on my browser
https://i.gyazo.com/1a6e72b07fb5693fd1fb2e578d2e10ef.png

@jfly
Copy link
Member Author

jfly commented Jan 5, 2017

anyways, I am hoping these changes I have proposed can be added, let me know what you guys think

There have been a lot of proposals in this thread. I've asked @alexmaass to write up a google doc summarizing all the ideas. After that, I think @FatBoyXPC, @keemy, and @jfly (that's me!) will vote on them (of course, agreeing to do something isn't the same thing as actually doing it, but we'll burn that bridge when we get to it)

@jfly
Copy link
Member Author

jfly commented Jan 5, 2017

@alexmaass, as for how the icons appear over on https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/competitions/ImaginaliaOpen2017/registrations, that probably more of a WCA website problem. What I mean is that the icons on that page are damn small, and maybe we could redesign so that the icons are not so dang tiny. That all said, it'll be interesting to see what that page looks like after we tweak the big cube icons.

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 10, 2017

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hxx_fu9MJr5k4ESqIACPhUI_fzXCFhBt-iFrh6KlSKY/edit?usp=sharing
nothing like having a comp and being sick with a stomach flu for delaying this : p

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 11, 2017

So, I think the numbers covering the squares are a cute idea, but they are unreadable.

I'm imagining we only get one tint color, but can we reduce the individual squares to small dots?

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 11, 2017

Also, I suggest making a "European" 7 with a horizontal stroke for maximum clarity.

@jfly
Copy link
Member Author

jfly commented Jan 11, 2017

I'm imagining we only get one tint color, but can we reduce the individual squares to small dots?

Yeah, we're targeting a font, so it has to be true black and white. Can you provide quick and dirty mockups of any ideas you have?

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 11, 2017

4

5

6

7

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 11, 2017

@lgarron but these aren't cubes, and ticks on 7s are terrible.

@jbmertens
Copy link
Member

@lgarron, I like that they are readable at 14px wide :)

I do like ticks on 7's. Other no-tick styles are ok too though:
sevens
big7

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 11, 2017

I have to agree with keemy, these represent cubes, so it is logical to have squares in it instead of circles. I strongly disapprove of the usage of circles. Maybe it would work to make the inner squares smaller?
Also, I agree that ticks look bad on 7s, but I'm guessing Europeans might be used to ticked 7s, maybe we could compromise and have smaller tricks?

And for what jbcm627 has suggested, I think that looks great!

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 11, 2017

@keemy could you update the svg files I suggested with smaller squares (also with the revised 7 jbcm has suggested)? unfortunately my SVG skills are too limited to do it accurately enough for final usage.

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 11, 2017

In case you want, the files are at https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FmQe6bc6yVQTVDbTJRWjBzeEk

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 11, 2017

Some variations:

circles-16-lines-20-square
all

circles-12-lines-16-square
all

circles-12-lines-24-square
all

circles-16-lines-16-rounded
all

circles-16-lines-16-square
all

circles-16-lines-24-square
all

squares-12-lines-20-square
all

squares-14-lines-20-square
all

squares-16-lines-16-square
all

squares-12-lines-24-square
all

squares-16-lines-20-square
all

squares-16-lines-24-square
all

I think I prefer circles-16-lines-20-square or squares-12-lines-20-square, followed by squares-12-lines-20-square.

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 11, 2017

Yeah, squares-12-lines-20-square without the dashed 7 looks better and more readable in my opinion!
image of what I'm referring to:
42c1d0b49a59e81ae4a2502f3548c624
(the subfolder of the folder for this in which Lucas linked is here: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B6FmQe6bc6yVUFdwamVfVWQtcWs)
I think these would be great!

@jfly
Copy link
Member Author

jfly commented Jan 12, 2017

I vote for the icons @alexmaass just posted here.

@lgarron, @keemy, @FatBoyXPC: what say you?

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 12, 2017

I still prefer the European 7 for the most-clear, most-connected option. :-)

But if we want the broken 7, what about these options?

screen shot 2017-01-11 at 18 12 42

screen shot 2017-01-11 at 18 13 36

@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 13, 2017

Also note that bigger cubes get pretty thin. Perhaps we should use squares-12-lines-24-square for those.

screen shot 2017-01-12 at 16 31 42 1

@keemy
Copy link
Contributor

keemy commented Jan 13, 2017

what about trying double wide on the 7 ?

jfly added a commit to jfly/icons that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2017
jfly added a commit to jfly/icons that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2017
@jfly jfly self-assigned this Jan 30, 2017
@lgarron
Copy link
Member

lgarron commented Jan 30, 2017

Also, heres a thicker 7:

thicker-7

@a-Maass
Copy link

a-Maass commented Jan 30, 2017

okay please no, this looks quite bad, though this was still worth trying out to see how it looked

jfly added a commit to jfly/icons that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2017
@dmint789
Copy link
Contributor

dmint789 commented Sep 8, 2023

So is this issue stale now?

@jfly
Copy link
Member Author

jfly commented Sep 8, 2023

I agree, I think we can close this. It's an interesting piece of history if someone does want to revisit this, but I'm not losing any sleep with how things are right now.

@jfly jfly closed this as completed Sep 8, 2023
@dmint789 dmint789 mentioned this issue Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants