This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Resolves #114 Hopefully appropriately given my track record today.
- Loading branch information
nmorduch
committed
Jul 19, 2014
1 parent
685a4a1
commit 1926282
Showing
3 changed files
with
5 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ $(function() { | |
// Add tooltips to elements with class "tipped". | ||
$('.tipped').tooltip(); | ||
|
||
// Add popovers to elements with class "popover-dismiss". | ||
$('.popped').popover(); | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
nmorduch
Contributor
|
||
|
||
// Bind some brambling-specific events to the countdown timer. | ||
$('[data-countdown="timer"]').on("updated.countdown", function (e, data) { | ||
var alert, | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Unless there's a strong preference, could we switch this to:
That way, the popover will disappear on next click instead of requiring a click on the (?) again. Seems more intuitive to me.
(Also, the comment doesn't accurately reflect what's being done.)