Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ingest): add classification to bigquery, redshift #10031

Conversation

mayurinehate
Copy link
Collaborator

Stacked on top of #10013

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@mayurinehate mayurinehate requested a review from hsheth2 March 12, 2024 14:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata community-contribution PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community labels Mar 12, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me

@mayurinehate mayurinehate changed the title feat(ingest): add classification for sql sources feat(ingest): add classification to bigquery, redshift Mar 13, 2024
Contains refractoring changes for snowflake classification
@mayurinehate mayurinehate force-pushed the master+ing-547-classification-bigquery-redshift branch from 6795dda to a030388 Compare March 13, 2024 07:24
@mayurinehate mayurinehate marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2024 11:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two non-blocking comments that we can do in a follow-up

data_reader_kwargs=dict(
sample_size_percent=(
self.config.classification.sample_size
* 1.2
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we extract out this 1.2 constant in a follow up PR?

@@ -447,6 +447,11 @@ class TeradataConfig(BaseTeradataConfig, BaseTimeWindowConfig):
@capability(SourceCapability.LINEAGE_COARSE, "Optionally enabled via configuration")
@capability(SourceCapability.LINEAGE_FINE, "Optionally enabled via configuration")
@capability(SourceCapability.USAGE_STATS, "Optionally enabled via configuration")
@capability(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the capability annotations support inheritance, so I don't think these are actually necessary

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondered why we had no annotation on SQLAlchemySource source. Some like PLATFORM_INSTANCE, DOMAINS, SCHEMA_METADATA, CONTAINERS, DELETION_DETECTION can probably move in there.

@hsheth2 hsheth2 merged commit 77c72da into datahub-project:master Mar 14, 2024
53 checks passed
mayurinehate added a commit to mayurinehate/datahub that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-contribution PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants