Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Postpone return type additions to 3.0 #331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2022

Conversation

greg0ire
Copy link
Member

@greg0ire greg0ire commented Sep 27, 2022

They prevent writing compatibility layers that would work with version 1 and 2 easily.

Prompted by doctrine/orm#10070

It might be interesting to review the new diff with the stable branch: 1.7.x...greg0ire:collections:revert-return-type-additions

@greg0ire greg0ire force-pushed the revert-return-type-additions branch 2 times, most recently from aef6c73 to 0dbcab3 Compare September 27, 2022 22:02
They prevent writing compatibility layers that would work with version 1
and 2 easily.
@greg0ire greg0ire force-pushed the revert-return-type-additions branch from 0dbcab3 to 76c8239 Compare September 27, 2022 22:02
@greg0ire greg0ire changed the title Postpone return type additions Postpone return type additions to 3.0 Sep 27, 2022
@greg0ire greg0ire marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2022 22:04
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member Author

If you feel some types should be made final or internal instead, please let me know.

@greg0ire greg0ire requested a review from alcaeus September 27, 2022 22:04
@greg0ire greg0ire added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Sep 28, 2022
@greg0ire greg0ire merged commit fbc051e into doctrine:2.0.x Sep 28, 2022
@greg0ire greg0ire deleted the revert-return-type-additions branch September 28, 2022 05:46
@alcaeus alcaeus removed their request for review September 28, 2022 06:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants