Prefer pattern-based over interface-based disposal in await using

docs/compilers/CSharp/Compiler Breaking Changes - DotNet 8.md

@@ -101,3 +101,26 @@ static class C
     public static string M(I2 o, in int x) => "2";
 }
 ```
+
+## Prefer pattern-based over interface-based disposal in async `using`
+
+***Introduced in Visual Studio 2022 version 17.10p3***
+
+An async `using` prefers to bind using a pattern-based `DisposeAsync()` method rather than the interface-based `IAsyncDisposable.DisposeAsync()`.
+
+For instance, the public `DisposeAsync()` method will be picked, rather than the private interface implementation:
+```csharp
+await using (var x = new C()) { }
+
+public class C : System.IAsyncDisposable
+{
+    ValueTask IAsyncDisposable.DisposeAsync() => throw null; // no longer picked
+
+    public async ValueTask DisposeAsync()
+    {
+        Console.WriteLine("PICKED");
+        await Task.Yield();
+    }
+}
+```
+

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/UsingStatementBinder.cs

@@ -183,31 +183,13 @@ internal static BoundStatement BindUsingStatementOrDeclarationFromParts(SyntaxNo
 
             bool bindDisposable(bool fromExpression, out MethodArgumentInfo? patternDisposeInfo, out TypeSymbol? awaitableType)
             {
-                TypeSymbol disposableInterface = getDisposableInterface(hasAwait);
-                Debug.Assert((object)disposableInterface != null);
-
-                CompoundUseSiteInfo<AssemblySymbol> useSiteInfo = originalBinder.GetNewCompoundUseSiteInfo(diagnostics);
-                Conversion iDisposableConversion = classifyConversion(fromExpression, disposableInterface, ref useSiteInfo);
                 patternDisposeInfo = null;
                 awaitableType = null;
-
-                diagnostics.Add(syntax, useSiteInfo);
-
-                if (iDisposableConversion.IsImplicit)
-                {
-                    if (hasAwait)
-                    {
-                        awaitableType = originalBinder.Compilation.GetWellKnownType(WellKnownType.System_Threading_Tasks_ValueTask);
-                    }
-
-                    return !ReportUseSite(disposableInterface, diagnostics, hasAwait ? awaitKeyword : usingKeyword);
-                }
-
                 Debug.Assert(!fromExpression || expressionOpt != null);
                 TypeSymbol? type = fromExpression ? expressionOpt!.Type : declarationTypeOpt;
 
+                // Pattern-based binding
                 // If this is a ref struct, or we're in a valid asynchronous using, try binding via pattern.
-                // We won't need to try and bind a second time if it fails, as async dispose can't be pattern based (ref structs are not allowed in async methods)
                 if (type is object && (type.IsRefLikeType || hasAwait))
                 {
                     BoundExpression? receiver = fromExpression
@@ -250,6 +232,25 @@ bool bindDisposable(bool fromExpression, out MethodArgumentInfo? patternDisposeI
                     }
                 }
 
+                // Interface binding
+                TypeSymbol disposableInterface = getDisposableInterface(hasAwait);
+                Debug.Assert((object)disposableInterface != null);
+
+                CompoundUseSiteInfo<AssemblySymbol> useSiteInfo = originalBinder.GetNewCompoundUseSiteInfo(diagnostics);
+                Conversion iDisposableConversion = classifyConversion(fromExpression, disposableInterface, ref useSiteInfo);
+
+                diagnostics.Add(syntax, useSiteInfo);
+
+                if (iDisposableConversion.IsImplicit)
+                {
+                    if (hasAwait)
+                    {
+                        awaitableType = originalBinder.Compilation.GetWellKnownType(WellKnownType.System_Threading_Tasks_ValueTask);
+                    }
+
+                    return !ReportUseSite(disposableInterface, diagnostics, hasAwait ? awaitKeyword : usingKeyword);
+                }
+
                 if (type is null || !type.IsErrorType())
                 {
                     // Retry with a different assumption about whether the `using` is async