Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] [wasm] Include browser targets if RID is not wasi-wasm #108434

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Backport of #108283 to release/9.0

/cc @maraf

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

When publishing blazor app to azure containers, the VS wizard generates linux-x64 RID by default (wizard for publishing to folder correctly picks browser-wasm RID).

This PR makes the browser targets included any time when RID is not wasi-wasm, instead of relying on RID being browser-wasm.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

The regression was introduced in #102806, where we started use Wasm SDK also for wasi targets and so we started to include browser targets only when RID is browser-wasm.

Testing

Manual test scenario.

Risk

Low. We have semantically reverted to previous behavior (include browser targets all the time with the exception for wasi).

@maraf maraf added the arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture label Oct 1, 2024
@maraf maraf added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@maraf maraf added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Oct 1, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

removing servicing consider label until there is a template filled in

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT removed the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Oct 8, 2024
@maraf
Copy link
Member

maraf commented Oct 9, 2024

@jeffschwMSFT I have forget to remove template placeholder from first paragraph, otherwise the template is filled. Should I put more details in there?

@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

thanks @maraf , can you elaborate on how the fix addresses the issue? I will approve and we can send in email for approval

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration in 9 GA

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Oct 9, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

please take a look at the pr failures.

@maraf
Copy link
Member

maraf commented Oct 11, 2024

All green now

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT merged commit 3fcc122 into release/9.0 Oct 11, 2024
10 of 16 checks passed
@maraf maraf deleted the backport/pr-108283-to-release/9.0 branch October 11, 2024 19:08
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants