Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] Initialize m_fInPlaceSS #109013

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Backport of #109008 to release/9.0

/cc @noahfalk

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

When debugging a .NET app in Visual Studio or other managed debugger and continuing for a breakpoint or step, the debuggee application may crash with an ExecutionEngineException non-deterministically. The non-determinism comes from reading an uninitialized boolean. If it happens to be non-zero the runtime may execute some code that leads to a crash. The exact set of factors and code-flow that creates the crash is still under investigation but exploratory testing suggests crashes may occur relatively frequently if the uninitialized memory value happens to be non-zero.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

#108872

Testing

So far the fix has only been code reviewed by me (Noah), and validated against our standard debugging tests. CI regression tests are in progress.

Risk

Very low - the fix initializes an uninitialized variable.

A recent fix added a new field to the DebuggerPatchSkip object and missed initializing it false. This causes the new in-place patch skipping logic activate at random depending on the value of uninitialized memory. Fixing this by initializing the variable.
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tommcdon
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@teo-tsirpanis teo-tsirpanis added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration for 9 GA... if not we will consider for 9.0.x

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Oct 18, 2024
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
Copy link
Member

All failures seem to be #108994.

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT merged commit ecefb5e into release/9.0 Oct 18, 2024
10 of 16 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants