Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline: Skip explicit intrinsics when inlining stmt functions #461

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Inline: Better way to skip intrinsic function calls in stmt func inliner

53394c7
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Inline: Skip explicit intrinsics when inlining stmt functions #461

Inline: Better way to skip intrinsic function calls in stmt func inliner
53394c7
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Codecov / codecov/project succeeded Dec 18, 2024 in 1s

93.29% (+0.00%) compared to 4c70917

View this Pull Request on Codecov

93.29% (+0.00%) compared to 4c70917

Details

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.29%. Comparing base (4c70917) to head (53394c7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #461   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.29%   93.29%           
=======================================
  Files         221      221           
  Lines       41360    41360           
=======================================
+ Hits        38587    38588    +1     
+ Misses       2773     2772    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.