Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

ethereum / consensus-specs Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 1k
Star 3.6k

Code
Issues 152
Pull requests 78
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

avoid overflow in slashing penalty calculation#1286

Merged

JustinDrake merged 5 commits intov08xethereum/consensus-specs:v08xfrom avoid-overflowethereum/consensus-specs:avoid-overflowCopy head branch name to clipboard

Jul 11, 2019

+17-5

Conversation Commits5 (5)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Jul 10, 2019

avoid overflow in slashing penalty calculation
djrtwo
committed
fix tests due to rounding when computing penalties in eth
djrtwo
committed
lint
djrtwo
committed
use EFFECTIVE_BALANCE_INCREMENT in penalty and avoid zeroing out
djrtwo
committed

Commits on Jul 11, 2019

Clean up presentation
JustinDrake
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.