chore: Experiment with gnoclient API #11
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jefft0
force-pushed
the
chore/test-gnoclient
branch
11 times, most recently
from
69bbce0 to
1df73d1
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jeff Thompson <[email protected]>
…ecCall. Signed-off-by: Jeff Thompson <[email protected]>
jefft0
force-pushed
the
chore/test-gnoclient
branch
from
1df73d1 to
4e284dd
Compare
|
Close this PR in favor of #14. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a draft branch to experiment with what the gnoclient API should look like.
Add a temp copy of gnoclient. Use it in execCall.
This would actually be done by PR gnolang/gno#1047 .