doc: remove 72-hour mentions in pull-requests.md #23309
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 tasks
|
typo in commit message |
thefourtheye
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2018
| longer to review, or need more specialized review from subject matter experts. | ||
| When in doubt, do not rush. | ||
| hours. In most cases, when the PR is relatively small and focused on a narrow | ||
| set of changes, these periods provide more than enough time to adequately |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think its not "these periods" anymore, as we have only 48 hours.
vsemozhetbyt
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules.
|
rebased against master, typo in commit message fixed, the CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/1157/ |
Trott
added
the
author ready
Trott
changed the title
cjihrig
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2018
lpinca
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2018
trivikr
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2018
|
Landed in b155358 |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: nodejs#23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: #23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
This was referenced Oct 10, 2018
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: #23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct
72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to
reflect current wait-time rules.
👍 here to fast-track.
Checklist