-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
domain: avoid circular memory references #25993
Conversation
Add a simple `WeakReference` utility that we can use until the language provides something on its own.
Avoid circular references that the JS engine cannot see through because it involves an `async id` ⇒ `domain` link. Using weak references is not a great solution, because it increases the domain module’s dependency on internals and the added calls into C++ may affect performance, but it seems like the least bad one. Fixes: nodejs#23862
This approach looks fine to me, given the current situation. How does the memory profile for this look like? E.g., taken the example from #23862 as-is, and hammering it with GET requests, how high would the memory usage be with and without domains usage on the server side? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM as much as I don't like it. At least it fixes a bad bug.
@ChALkeR What I’m getting is about 8 kB per request with that example before this patch, and flat memory usage afterwards. |
That is what I was expecting, but I was curious about the exact memory usage profile with/without domains code on the server logic side (with this patch enabled) for the same requests pattern. Anyway, this change looks good to me in approach and code-wise. I have not tested this locally (yet?), but this should be good once CI passes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand the API of WeakReference
. Could you write a cctest for it?
I don’t think a cctest makes sense, but I could write a regular test if you feel that it’s important. |
If we want to reuse this is other code path I think we should cover the API. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Technically this would mean that CLS-like implementation based on Async Hooks should be rewriten ovev domain as there is no mem leak anymore here.
@refack I think we want to avoid that as much as possible. I’ve added a test, though.
@vdeturckheim No, that’s not necessarily true. The problem here is specific to domains, because they (needlessly?) keep references to objects that they track. Ideally, we’d revert this change and remove |
(That’s doesn’t mean that it’s not easy to run into memory leaks when using async_hooks, but that’s a fundamental design flaw and a much bigger issue.) |
@@ -53,20 +57,22 @@ const asyncHook = createHook({ | |||
init(asyncId, type, triggerAsyncId, resource) { | |||
if (process.domain !== null && process.domain !== undefined) { | |||
// If this operation is created while in a domain, let's mark it | |||
pairing.set(asyncId, process.domain); | |||
pairing.set(asyncId, process.domain[kWeak]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it conceivable that user code tampers with process.domain
?
What would happen if I set process.domain = {}
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t think the domain code is all that tampering-proof to being with…
I’m also not sure what we could do in that case.
static void Get(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { | ||
WeakReference* weak_ref = Unwrap<WeakReference>(args.Holder()); | ||
Isolate* isolate = args.GetIsolate(); | ||
if (!weak_ref->target_.IsEmpty()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically not necessary: Persistent<T>::Get()
will return an empty handle, causing ReturnValue<T>::Set()
to default to undefined
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought about it, and I think I’d prefer an explicit variant here, so that it’s a bit more obvious what happens when the object has been GC’ed…
Add a simple `WeakReference` utility that we can use until the language provides something on its own. PR-URL: #25993 Fixes: #23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Avoid circular references that the JS engine cannot see through because it involves an `async id` ⇒ `domain` link. Using weak references is not a great solution, because it increases the domain module’s dependency on internals and the added calls into C++ may affect performance, but it seems like the least bad one. PR-URL: #25993 Fixes: #23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Is this fix planned to be back-ported to the v10 release? |
Any update if this will be backported to LTS? |
Add a simple `WeakReference` utility that we can use until the language provides something on its own. PR-URL: nodejs#25993 Fixes: nodejs#23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Avoid circular references that the JS engine cannot see through because it involves an `async id` ⇒ `domain` link. Using weak references is not a great solution, because it increases the domain module’s dependency on internals and the added calls into C++ may affect performance, but it seems like the least bad one. PR-URL: nodejs#25993 Fixes: nodejs#23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Backport opened in #27749 |
Add a simple `WeakReference` utility that we can use until the language provides something on its own. Backport-PR-URL: #27749 PR-URL: #25993 Fixes: #23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Avoid circular references that the JS engine cannot see through because it involves an `async id` ⇒ `domain` link. Using weak references is not a great solution, because it increases the domain module’s dependency on internals and the added calls into C++ may affect performance, but it seems like the least bad one. Backport-PR-URL: #27749 PR-URL: #25993 Fixes: #23862 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
src: add WeakReference utility
Add a simple
WeakReference
utility that we can use until thelanguage provides something on its own.
domain: avoid circular memory references
Avoid circular references that the JS engine cannot see through
because it involves an
async id
⇒domain
link.Using weak references is not a great solution, because it increases
the domain module’s dependency on internals and the added calls into
C++ may affect performance, but it seems like the least bad one.
Fixes: #23862
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes