-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[model/semconv] Add missing files for semconv v1.7.0 and v1.8.0 #5091
[model/semconv] Add missing files for semconv v1.7.0 and v1.8.0 #5091
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5091 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13%
=======================================
Files 183 183
Lines 11023 11023
=======================================
Hits 9936 9936
Misses 865 865
Partials 222 222 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
40a90f7
to
4599cf3
Compare
4599cf3
to
7197b22
Compare
Some files that are supposed to be created manually were missed in semconv v1.7.0 and v1.8.0
7197b22
to
c81fe5c
Compare
@Aneurysm9 PTAL if the change of SchemaURL value is needed, or if there is any reason to keep the |
Ready for review. The schema URL is confirmed by @tigrannajaryan in #5103 |
const ( | ||
OtelLibraryName = "otel.library.name" | ||
OtelLibraryVersion = "otel.library.version" | ||
OtelStatusCode = "otel.status_code" | ||
OtelStatusDescription = "otel.status_description" | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume this is an exact copy from 1.6.1 directory, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is. I didn't find any changes on these definitions up to 1.10.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we managed to not have these (especially because they are manually written), is this a sign that we don't need them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we managed to not have these (especially because they are manually written), is this a sign that we don't need them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we managed to not have these (especially because they are manually written), is this a sign that we don't need them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise, what is our plan to not forget about these for the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can add a test verifying that the files are created
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added the test #5106
…-telemetry#5091) Some files that are supposed to be created manually were missed in semconv v1.7.0 and v1.8.0
Some files that are supposed to be created manually were missed in semconv v1.7.0 and v1.8.0