Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement display_type() on Slice #2365

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2024

Conversation

jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Member

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ› Bug fix
βœ“ ✨ New feature

Description

Refs https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/actions/runs/7679035255/job/20929509375?pr=9241

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a82d9d9) 92.86% compared to head (8432264) 92.85%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2365      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.86%   92.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          94       94              
  Lines       11072    11074       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        10282    10283       +1     
- Misses        790      791       +1     
Flag Coverage Ξ”
linux 92.66% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pypy 90.99% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
windows 92.45% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Ξ”
astroid/nodes/node_classes.py 94.79% <50.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️

astroid/nodes/node_classes.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit d910562 into pylint-dev:main Jan 28, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls deleted the slice-display-type branch January 28, 2024 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants