Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine if it is possible to publish risc0-aggregation with set builder image ID and ELF #353

Open
nategraf opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@nategraf
Copy link
Contributor

nategraf commented Dec 5, 2024

No description provided.

@nategraf nategraf added the build label Dec 5, 2024
nategraf added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2024
…g to crates.io (#354)

This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming
from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo.
It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all
code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`.
In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need
to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are
always used, these values will flucuate.
There is an open issue on how to better manage these values.

Related #353
nategraf added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2024
…g to crates.io (#354)

This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming
from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo.
It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all
code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`.
In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need
to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are
always used, these values will flucuate.
There is an open issue on how to better manage these values.

Related #353
capossele pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2024
…ing to crates.io (#354) (#357)

This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming
from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo.
It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all
code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`.
In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need
to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are
always used, these values will flucuate.
There is an open issue on how to better manage these values.

Related #353
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant