-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Determine if it is possible to publish risc0-aggregation with set builder image ID and ELF #353
Labels
Comments
nategraf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2024
…g to crates.io (#354) This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo. It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`. In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are always used, these values will flucuate. There is an open issue on how to better manage these values. Related #353
nategraf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2024
…g to crates.io (#354) This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo. It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`. In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are always used, these values will flucuate. There is an open issue on how to better manage these values. Related #353
capossele
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2024
…ing to crates.io (#354) (#357) This PR resolves issues with publishing `risc0-aggregation` stemming from dependency on the `set-builder` guest through Cargo. It does so by removing usage of that guest, which is in the form of all code dependending on `SET_BUILDER_ID` or `SET_BUILDER_ELF`. In practice, these values are difficult to use anyway, because they need to align with an on-chain verifier. Unless reproducible builds are always used, these values will flucuate. There is an open issue on how to better manage these values. Related #353
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: