-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Guarantee that raw pointer conversions preserve slice element count #1417
Conversation
This encodes the behavior agreed upon in rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#288.
Friendly ping 🙂 |
Nominating for lang, but I'm not sure if they would defer this decision to someone else, like t-opsem. cc @RalfJung |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Substance LGTM, I have a nitpick on the wording.
@rfcbot fcp merge We discussed in the @rust-lang/lang meeting today and meeting consensus was to merge this. Documenting that. |
Team member @nikomatsakis has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! cc @rust-lang/lang-advisors: FCP proposed for lang, please feel free to register concerns. |
This sounds like a lang decision to me, since it's about stable guarantees of how a type works. Still Cc @rust-lang/opsem |
I think this is often sketchy, and it might overall be better to encourage @rfcbot reviewed |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 psst @nikomatsakis, I wasn't able to add the |
Also worth noting that |
@rustbot labels -I-lang-nominated This was discussed today and is now in FCP. We'll remove the nomination. |
Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <[email protected]>
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. This will be merged soon. psst @nikomatsakis, I wasn't able to add the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Update books ## rust-lang/reference 4 commits in 16fd3c06d9e558dae2d52000818274ae70c9e90a..cd8193e972f61b92117095fc73b67af767b4d6bc 2023-11-04 17:19:39 UTC to 2023-10-30 16:04:52 UTC - Guarantee that raw pointer conversions preserve slice element count (rust-lang/reference#1417) - some asm block flags also mean there can be no fences (rust-lang/reference#1413) - Guarantee `char` layout (rust-lang/reference#1401) - Doc: Add the RISC-V stabilized target features (rust-lang/reference#1415) ## rust-lang/rust-by-example 3 commits in 6709beeb7d0fbc5ffc91ac4893a24434123b9bfa..311b84962016b28c75525c86e7b3f49fd9101a39 2023-10-31 18:32:09 UTC to 2023-10-31 18:30:39 UTC - Fixed explanation mistake in comment (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1761) - Fix typos (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1759) - docs(9.2): fix typo (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1754) ## rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide 6 commits in b0ee9ec..77dbe57 2023-11-06 16:14:34 UTC to 2023-10-29 17:16:02 UTC - add a new type system invariant (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1822) - Update some outdated descriptions of coverage instrumentation (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1809) - Add some documentation for unsizing (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1817) - Bibliography: fixing author of "You Can't Spell Trust Without Rust" (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1815) - remove change-id from sample build configuration (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1813) - Update name of "active" features to "unstable" (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1814)
Rollup merge of rust-lang#117639 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss Update books ## rust-lang/reference 4 commits in 16fd3c06d9e558dae2d52000818274ae70c9e90a..cd8193e972f61b92117095fc73b67af767b4d6bc 2023-11-04 17:19:39 UTC to 2023-10-30 16:04:52 UTC - Guarantee that raw pointer conversions preserve slice element count (rust-lang/reference#1417) - some asm block flags also mean there can be no fences (rust-lang/reference#1413) - Guarantee `char` layout (rust-lang/reference#1401) - Doc: Add the RISC-V stabilized target features (rust-lang/reference#1415) ## rust-lang/rust-by-example 3 commits in 6709beeb7d0fbc5ffc91ac4893a24434123b9bfa..311b84962016b28c75525c86e7b3f49fd9101a39 2023-10-31 18:32:09 UTC to 2023-10-31 18:30:39 UTC - Fixed explanation mistake in comment (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1761) - Fix typos (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1759) - docs(9.2): fix typo (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1754) ## rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide 6 commits in b0ee9ec..77dbe57 2023-11-06 16:14:34 UTC to 2023-10-29 17:16:02 UTC - add a new type system invariant (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1822) - Update some outdated descriptions of coverage instrumentation (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1809) - Add some documentation for unsizing (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1817) - Bibliography: fixing author of "You Can't Spell Trust Without Rust" (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1815) - remove change-id from sample build configuration (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1813) - Update name of "active" features to "unstable" (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1814)
Since raw pointer slice casts are now guaranteed to preserve element count [1], we no longer need to separately store the byte length of a `Ptr`. Instead, we can compute it from the raw pointer field. [1] rust-lang/reference#1417
Since raw pointer slice casts are now guaranteed to preserve element count [1], we no longer need to separately store the byte length of a `Ptr`. Instead, we can compute it from the raw pointer field. [1] rust-lang/reference#1417
Since raw pointer slice casts are now guaranteed to preserve element count [1], we no longer need to separately store the byte length of a `Ptr`. Instead, we can compute it from the raw pointer field. [1] rust-lang/reference#1417
This encodes the behavior agreed upon in rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#288.