Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #110239

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Apr 12, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #110239

merged 22 commits into from
Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

JakobDegen and others added 22 commits April 9, 2023 18:16
It has a single callsite.
I have no idea why it's here, but it's not used at all.
It's a more descriptive name.
It has a single call site, and the code is clearer with all region kinds
handled in one function, instead of splitting the handling across two
functions.

The commit also changes `DescriptionCtx::new` to use a more declarative
style, instead of creating a default `DescriptionCtx` and modifying it,
which I find easier to read.
For similar reasons to the previous commit.
…ompiler-errors

Fix transmute intrinsic mir validation ICE

I stumbled across this at work, the minimal reproducer is included as a test which ICEs before this change.

I'm not 100% sure this is the right fix, but it matches what we do in `mir_assign_valid_types` so seems reasonable at least.

fixes rust-lang#110151

r? `@lcnr` since they've been keeping the relevant logic correct, cc `@scottmcm`
Use `itertools::Either` instead of own impl

Yeah.
…=jyn514

Remove orphaned remove_dir_all implementation from rust-installer

I have no idea why it's here, but it's not used at all.

r? Mark-Simulacrum
Custom MIR: Support `BinOp::Offset`

Since offset doesn't have an infix operator, a new function `Offset` is added which is lowered to `Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Offset, ..)`

r? ```@oli-obk``` or ```@tmiasko``` or ```@JakobDegen```
…s, r=davidtwco

`DescriptionCtx` cleanups

Best reviewed one commit at a time.

r? `@davidtwco`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 12, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Apr 12, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2023

📌 Commit a954584 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 12, 2023
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 12, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a954584 with merge 59a05ad...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 59a05ad to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 12, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 59a05ad into rust-lang:master Apr 12, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 12, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (59a05ad): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.5%, 0.8%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.7% [-0.8%, -0.6%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [-0.8%, 0.8%] 6

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.5%, 3.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-o90hx4s branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.