Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor builtin unsize handling, extend comments #114169

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Jul 28, 2023

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jul 28, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 28, 2023

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 28, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me nits or no

Comment on lines +526 to +529
a_data: &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
a_region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
b_data: &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
b_region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it costs very much to just destructure ty::Dynamic again and bug!() here instead of passing this data, but I guess it's ok 😅

That is, I'd rather just pass all the data once (in the goal) rather than both as one package (the goal) + partially destructured (a/b data)

Comment on lines +610 to +611
b_data: &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
b_region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

@compiler-errors compiler-errors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2023
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Jul 31, 2023

@bors r=compiler-errors rollup

I see where you're coming from but also dislike having to bug!() inside of these functions

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2023

📌 Commit 17f87c5 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 31, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#114111 (Improve test case for experimental API remove_matches)
 - rust-lang#114169 (refactor builtin unsize handling, extend comments)
 - rust-lang#114182 (clean up after 113312)
 - rust-lang#114193 (Update lexer emoji diagnostics to Unicode 15.0)
 - rust-lang#114200 (Detect trait upcasting through struct tail unsizing in new solver select)
 - rust-lang#114228 (Check lazy type aliases for well-formedness)
 - rust-lang#114267 (Map RPITIT's opaque type bounds back from projections to opaques)
 - rust-lang#114269 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
 - rust-lang#114286 (Add missing feature gate in multiple_supertrait_upcastable doc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b8f78fb into rust-lang:master Jul 31, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Jul 31, 2023
@lcnr lcnr deleted the unsize branch July 31, 2023 23:46
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor

klensy commented Aug 3, 2023

While working on #114209 i noticed that consider_builtin_unsize_candidate was changed, but not rematch_unsize which have note that it should be in sync with it consider_builtin_unsize_candidate. Is it was in sync before, now, or it it still not?

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Aug 4, 2023

the changes are non-functional so I think it should still be in sync, but I did not think about this explicitly so I am going to take another look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants