Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #114226

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 30, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 3 pull requests #114226

merged 8 commits into from
Jul 30, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

GuillaumeGomez and others added 8 commits July 29, 2023 14:39
…notriddle

Rustdoc small cleanups

Each commit does some little cleanups:

 * We had some `Res` comparisons in multiple places (and still do, but unless we use a macro, it's not possible to "merge" any further) so I moved it into a function.
 * It was weird to have some utils function used everywhere in `visit_ast` so I instead moved it into `clean/utils.rs`.
 * In HTML rendering, we had some write "issues":
   * Multiple calls that could be merged into one.
   * Some `write!` that could be `write_str`.
   * We didn't use the new `format!` args much.

r? `@notriddle`
[rustc][data_structures] Simplify binary_search_slice.

Instead of using `binary_search_by_key`, it's possible to use `partition_point` to find the lower bound. This avoids the need to locate the leftmost matching entry separately.

It's also possible to use `partition_point` to find the upper bound, so I plan to send a separate PR for your consideration.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 29, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2023

📌 Commit d4926b1 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 29, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit d4926b1 with merge fb53384...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 30, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing fb53384 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 30, 2023
@bors bors merged commit fb53384 into rust-lang:master Jul 30, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Jul 30, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#114129 Rustdoc small cleanups adbf3c62be892c42cd23e70825fde4d8d72cec7e (link)
#114152 [rustc][data_structures] Simplify binary_search_slice. 0298c050cc1b1ce7588e97729ec137ba973fbc33 (link)
#114222 Mark lazy_type_alias as incomplete aad10b5806d2a4b4de93eceedf0b5adec5624324 (link)

previous master: b969b830aa

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fb53384): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 650.727s -> 649.757s (-0.15%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-wxdudsm branch March 16, 2024 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants