Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #117444

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #117444

merged 13 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

estebank and others added 13 commits October 30, 2023 00:56
These checks should be cheap, so there's little reason for them to be
debug-only.
Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump
additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was
removed by rust-lang#115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic
when they detect a bug.
Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks

See rust-lang#115933 (comment) for the reason.

This PR essentially just deduplicates code by moving it into a macro
When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers

Fix rust-lang#116252.
…r=oli-obk

Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted

Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.

Happy to iterate on this.

Fixes rust-lang#117413

r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions

Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was removed by rust-lang#115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic immediately when they detect a bug.
…i-obk

Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.

Fixes rust-lang#117362
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 31, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2023

📌 Commit f623530 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 31, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f623530 with merge 045f158...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 045f158 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 31, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 045f158 into rust-lang:master Oct 31, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Oct 31, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#116267 Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks ac4204b0529f77c24f992ad743b4ab37c6b0ac4c (link)
#116712 When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check … d46bfc9511758278c083b7bf1b22871e3ed118e2 (link)
#117416 Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is ta… 7ebf65900441a2cb6c1562e2658a14fad1dedc6c (link)
#117421 coverage: Replace impossible coverage::Error with asserti… b4130943522a3edd54ceb6d8ed548b7a3cd219a5 (link)
#117438 Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN. fbbd3535ca14f4360743545465d371a44cb32a81 (link)

previous master: 22b27120b9

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (045f158): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [1.4%, 4.3%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.3% [-4.3%, -4.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 636.003s -> 636.965s (0.15%)
Artifact size: 304.48 MiB -> 304.41 MiB (-0.02%)

bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
78: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=tshepang a=github-actions[bot]


This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository:

* rust-lang/rust#113970
* rust-lang/rust#117459
  * rust-lang/rust#117451
  * rust-lang/rust#117439
  * rust-lang/rust#117417
  * rust-lang/rust#117388
  * rust-lang/rust#113241
* rust-lang/rust#117462
* rust-lang/rust#117450
* rust-lang/rust#117407
* rust-lang/rust#117444
  * rust-lang/rust#117438
  * rust-lang/rust#117421
  * rust-lang/rust#117416
  * rust-lang/rust#116712
  * rust-lang/rust#116267
* rust-lang/rust#117377
* rust-lang/rust#117419



Co-authored-by: Alexis (Poliorcetics) Bourget <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Esteban Küber <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: David Tolnay <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Celina G. Val <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bors <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Camille GILLOT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: lcnr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zalathar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <[email protected]>
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-43s0spc branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants