-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #117444
Rollup of 5 pull requests #117444
Conversation
These checks should be cheap, so there's little reason for them to be debug-only.
Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was removed by rust-lang#115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic when they detect a bug.
…nvocation arguments into the macro
…imd, as these always go together.
Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks See rust-lang#115933 (comment) for the reason. This PR essentially just deduplicates code by moving it into a macro
When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers Fix rust-lang#116252.
…r=oli-obk Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though. Happy to iterate on this. Fixes rust-lang#117413 r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was removed by rust-lang#115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic immediately when they detect a bug.
…i-obk Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN. Fixes rust-lang#117362
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 22b27120b9 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (045f158): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 636.003s -> 636.965s (0.15%) |
78: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=tshepang a=github-actions[bot] This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository: * rust-lang/rust#113970 * rust-lang/rust#117459 * rust-lang/rust#117451 * rust-lang/rust#117439 * rust-lang/rust#117417 * rust-lang/rust#117388 * rust-lang/rust#113241 * rust-lang/rust#117462 * rust-lang/rust#117450 * rust-lang/rust#117407 * rust-lang/rust#117444 * rust-lang/rust#117438 * rust-lang/rust#117421 * rust-lang/rust#117416 * rust-lang/rust#116712 * rust-lang/rust#116267 * rust-lang/rust#117377 * rust-lang/rust#117419 Co-authored-by: Alexis (Poliorcetics) Bourget <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Esteban Küber <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Tolnay <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Celina G. Val <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bors <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Camille GILLOT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: lcnr <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zalathar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <[email protected]>
Successful merges:
coverage::Error
with assertions #117421 (coverage: Replace impossiblecoverage::Error
with assertions)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup