Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make negative_bounds internal & fix some of its issues #119354

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented Dec 27, 2023

r? compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 27, 2023
@@ -17,4 +16,7 @@ fn test3<T: !Trait<Assoc: Send>>() {}
fn test4<T>() where T: !Trait<Assoc: Send> {}
//~^ ERROR associated type constraints not allowed on negative bounds

fn test5<T>() where T: !Fn() -> i32 {}
Copy link
Member Author

@fmease fmease Dec 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one used to ice with no errors encountered even though `span_delayed_bug` issued // negative trait bounds should not have bindings.

Comment on lines 15 to 21
fn weird0() -> impl Sized + !Sized {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| ERROR type mismatch resolving `() == impl !Sized`
fn weird1() -> impl Sized + !Sized {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| ERROR type mismatch resolving `() == impl !Sized`
fn weird2() -> impl !Sized + Sized {}
Copy link
Member Author

@fmease fmease Dec 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We elaborate !Sized to !Sized + Sized which is odd and which I guess we should change?

In the pretty printer, I “unelaborate” any Sized bounds even if we have a !Sized bound to mirror rustc_hir_analysis's elab.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!Sized should opt out implicit sized bounds like ?Sized

@fmease fmease changed the title Tweak negative_bound's impl & mark it as internal Tweak negative_bounds's impl & mark it as internal Dec 27, 2023
@rustbot

This comment was marked as resolved.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@fmease fmease changed the title Tweak negative_bounds's impl & mark it as internal Tweak negative_bounds's impl & mark the feature as internal Dec 27, 2023
@fmease fmease changed the title Tweak negative_bounds's impl & mark the feature as internal Some fixes for negative_bounds & mark the feature as internal Dec 27, 2023
@rust-lang rust-lang deleted a comment from rustbot Dec 27, 2023
@rust-lang rust-lang deleted a comment from rustbot Dec 27, 2023
@fmease fmease force-pushed the negative_bounds-fixes branch from 1ec73ce to 66ab625 Compare December 27, 2023 19:14
@fmease fmease added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2023
@fmease fmease force-pushed the negative_bounds-fixes branch from 66ab625 to 9512f23 Compare December 27, 2023 23:36
@fmease fmease added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 27, 2023
@fmease fmease changed the title Some fixes for negative_bounds & mark the feature as internal Make negative_bounds internal & fix some of its issues Dec 27, 2023
@rust-lang rust-lang deleted a comment from rustbot Dec 27, 2023
@fmease fmease force-pushed the negative_bounds-fixes branch from 9512f23 to 0f6fc44 Compare December 27, 2023 23:50
@fmease fmease force-pushed the negative_bounds-fixes branch from 0f6fc44 to 977546d Compare December 27, 2023 23:59
// There was in fact a `?Sized` bound, return without doing anything
} else {
// There was no `?Sized` bound; add implicitly sized if `Sized` is available.
if seen_sized_unbound || seen_negative_sized_bound {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if I should reject !Sized + ?Sized: (kinda) “redundant ?Sized bound” // “!Sized already opts out of Sized”.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 4, 2024

📌 Commit 977546d has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 4, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117556 (Disallow reference to `static mut` and adding `static_mut_ref` lint)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119420 (Handle ForeignItem as TAIT scope.)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`)
 - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.)
 - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint)
 - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature)
 - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119414 (bootstrap: Move -Clto= setting from Rustc::run to rustc_cargo)
 - rust-lang#119420 (Handle ForeignItem as TAIT scope.)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119538 (Cleanup error handlers: round 5)
 - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`)
 - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.)
 - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint)
 - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature)
 - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118680 (Add support for shell argfiles)
 - rust-lang#119151 (Hide foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths in import suggestions)
 - rust-lang#119350 (Imply outlives-bounds on lazy type aliases)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119554 (Fix scoping for let chains in match guards)
 - rust-lang#119563 (Check yield terminator's resume type in borrowck)
 - rust-lang#119589 (cstore: Remove unnecessary locking from `CrateMetadata`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119151 (Hide foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths in import suggestions)
 - rust-lang#119350 (Imply outlives-bounds on lazy type aliases)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119554 (Fix scoping for let chains in match guards)
 - rust-lang#119563 (Check yield terminator's resume type in borrowck)
 - rust-lang#119589 (cstore: Remove unnecessary locking from `CrateMetadata`)
 - rust-lang#119622 (never patterns: Document behavior of never patterns with macros-by-example)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ea61290 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 5, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119354 - fmease:negative_bounds-fixes, r=compiler-errors

Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues

r? compiler-errors
@fmease fmease deleted the negative_bounds-fixes branch January 5, 2024 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants