Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix scoping for let chains in match guards #119554

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

If let guards were previously represented as a different type of guard in HIR and THIR. This meant that let chains in match guards were not handled correctly because they were treated exactly like normal guards.

  • Remove hir::Guard and thir::Guard.
  • Make the scoping different between normal guards and if let guards also check for let chains.

closes #118593

@matthewjasper matthewjasper added F-let_chains `#![feature(let_chains)]` F-if_let_guard `#![feature(if_let_guard)]` labels Jan 3, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 3, 2024

r? @WaffleLapkin

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 3, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 3, 2024

Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes.

cc @nnethercote

Some changes might have occurred in exhaustiveness checking

cc @Nadrieril

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ pub struct Arm<'hir> {
/// If this pattern and the optional guard matches, then `body` is evaluated.
pub pat: &'hir Pat<'hir>,
/// Optional guard clause.
pub guard: Option<Guard<'hir>>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I've always been so confused why this was represented differently in HIR. This was also what caused the bug fixed by #119402, for example.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think if_let_guards was implemented before let chains were ready. But it's definitely outstayed its usefulness.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 4, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question below.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 4, 2024
@matthewjasper matthewjasper force-pushed the remove-guard-distinction branch from 43d59ba to 6c935b3 Compare January 4, 2024 17:20
Use Expr instead. Use `ExprKind::Let` to represent if let guards.
Use Expr instead. Use `ExprKind::Let` to represent if let guards.
Match guards with an if let guard or an if let chain guard should have a
temporary scope of the whole arm. This is to allow ref bindings to
temporaries to borrow check.
@matthewjasper matthewjasper force-pushed the remove-guard-distinction branch from 6c935b3 to 44bba54 Compare January 5, 2024 10:57
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 5, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2024

📌 Commit 44bba54 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…tion, r=compiler-errors

Fix scoping for let chains in match guards

If let guards were previously represented as a different type of guard in HIR and THIR. This meant that let chains in match guards were not handled correctly because they were treated exactly like normal guards.

- Remove `hir::Guard` and `thir::Guard`.
- Make the scoping different between normal guards and if let guards also check for let chains.

closes rust-lang#118593
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…tion, r=compiler-errors

Fix scoping for let chains in match guards

If let guards were previously represented as a different type of guard in HIR and THIR. This meant that let chains in match guards were not handled correctly because they were treated exactly like normal guards.

- Remove `hir::Guard` and `thir::Guard`.
- Make the scoping different between normal guards and if let guards also check for let chains.

closes rust-lang#118593
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118680 (Add support for shell argfiles)
 - rust-lang#119151 (Hide foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths in import suggestions)
 - rust-lang#119350 (Imply outlives-bounds on lazy type aliases)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119554 (Fix scoping for let chains in match guards)
 - rust-lang#119563 (Check yield terminator's resume type in borrowck)
 - rust-lang#119589 (cstore: Remove unnecessary locking from `CrateMetadata`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119151 (Hide foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths in import suggestions)
 - rust-lang#119350 (Imply outlives-bounds on lazy type aliases)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119554 (Fix scoping for let chains in match guards)
 - rust-lang#119563 (Check yield terminator's resume type in borrowck)
 - rust-lang#119589 (cstore: Remove unnecessary locking from `CrateMetadata`)
 - rust-lang#119622 (never patterns: Document behavior of never patterns with macros-by-example)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 958417f into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 5, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119554 - matthewjasper:remove-guard-distinction, r=compiler-errors

Fix scoping for let chains in match guards

If let guards were previously represented as a different type of guard in HIR and THIR. This meant that let chains in match guards were not handled correctly because they were treated exactly like normal guards.

- Remove `hir::Guard` and `thir::Guard`.
- Make the scoping different between normal guards and if let guards also check for let chains.

closes rust-lang#118593
@matthewjasper matthewjasper deleted the remove-guard-distinction branch January 8, 2024 12:54
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
…tion, r=compiler-errors

Fix scoping for let chains in match guards

If let guards were previously represented as a different type of guard in HIR and THIR. This meant that let chains in match guards were not handled correctly because they were treated exactly like normal guards.

- Remove `hir::Guard` and `thir::Guard`.
- Make the scoping different between normal guards and if let guards also check for let chains.

closes rust-lang#118593
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
F-if_let_guard `#![feature(if_let_guard)]` F-let_chains `#![feature(let_chains)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

if_let_guard + let_chains: used binding is possibly-uninitialized
6 participants