[beta] Revert r-a completions breakage

[SomeoneToIgnore]

As suggested by @cuviper in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/Completion.20IDs/near/484770216

Repeats the revert to stable #133476 using https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/rust-lang/rust/pull/133476.diff

cc @BoxyUwU @workingjubilee

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

[rustbot]

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=never

Seems reasonable.

[bors]

📌 Commit 8d3b048 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 8d3b048 with merge ea5e5ca...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing ea5e5ca to beta...