Revert "Auto merge of #133654 - weihanglo:update-cargo, r=weihanglo"

[nikic]

This reverts commit 76f3ff6, reversing changes made to 1fc691e.

The new pgo_works test fails when rust is built without profiling support, including in CI on x86_64-gnu-aux. See #133499 (comment) for how this happened.

[rustbot]

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo

cc @ehuss

[nikic]

@bors treeclosed=100

[lqd]

r=me if you don't need a t-cargo approval

[nikic]

Don't think we need t-cargo approval as this is just a revert.

@bors r=lqd p=1000

[bors]

📌 Commit f5691ba has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f5691ba with merge e48ddd8...

[RalfJung]

Assuming this will land, let's make sure the queue can proceed immediately.

@bors treeclosed-

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing e48ddd8 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e48ddd8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.6%	[0.6%, 0.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.6%	[0.6%, 0.6%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -5.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-5.0%	[-5.0%, -5.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-5.0%	[-5.0%, -5.0%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 773.805s -> 773.769s (-0.00%)
Artifact size: 332.32 MiB -> 332.32 MiB (0.00%)