-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resolve: Relax macro resolution consistency check to account for any errors #78327
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @eddyb (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Oct 24, 2020
petrochenkov
force-pushed
the
inconsist
branch
from
October 24, 2020 18:26
ea454f5
to
ef09ed2
Compare
Ha-ha, no. |
jyn514
added
A-macros
Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)
A-resolve
Area: Name resolution
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Oct 24, 2020
I'm not very familiar with the resolver code. However, this change looks entirely safe - we're just relaxing a check that (now) emits a @bors r+ |
📌 Commit ef09ed2 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 24, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2020
…as-schievink Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#75115 (`#[deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in sys/cloudabi) - rust-lang#76614 (change the order of type arguments on ControlFlow) - rust-lang#77610 (revise Hermit's mutex interface to support the behaviour of StaticMutex) - rust-lang#77830 (Simplify query proc-macros) - rust-lang#77930 (Do not ICE with TraitPredicates containing [type error]) - rust-lang#78069 (Fix const core::panic!(non_literal_str).) - rust-lang#78072 (Cleanup constant matching in exhaustiveness checking) - rust-lang#78119 (Throw core::panic!("message") as &str instead of String.) - rust-lang#78191 (Introduce a temporary for discriminant value in MatchBranchSimplification) - rust-lang#78272 (const_evaluatable_checked: deal with unused nodes + div) - rust-lang#78318 (TyCtxt: generate single impl block with `slice_interners` macro) - rust-lang#78327 (resolve: Relax macro resolution consistency check to account for any errors) Failed merges: r? `@ghost`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-macros
Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)
A-resolve
Area: Name resolution
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The check was previously omitted only when ambiguity errors or
Res::Err
were encountered, but the "macro-expandedextern crate
items cannot shadow..." error (at least) can cause same inconsistencies as well.Fixes #78325