Rollup of 8 pull requests #96804
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #96804
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…istered step Before: ``` thread 'main' panicked at 'error: no rules matched invalid', src/bootstrap/builder.rs:287:17 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` After: ``` error: no `check` rules matched 'invalid' help: run `x.py check --help --verbose` to show a list of available paths note: if you are adding a new Step to bootstrap itself, make sure you register it with `describe!` ```
Bootstrap currently provides `-Zunstable-options` for OpenBSD when using split debuginfo - this commit provides it for all BSD targets. Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_session/lint/builtin.rs returns page not found. The following is the background of the move. First rust-lang#74862 moves from src/librustc_session/lint/builtin.rs to compiler/rustc_session/src/lint/builtin.rs Then rust-lang@23018a5 moves from compiler/rustc_session/src/lint/builtin.rs to compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs So, the current correct link is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs This PR fixes a broken link on the following page: https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/plugin.html
…=Mark-Simulacrum [bootstrap] Give a better error when trying to run a path with no registered step Before: ``` thread 'main' panicked at 'error: no rules matched invalid', src/bootstrap/builder.rs:287:17 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` After: ``` error: no `check` rules matched 'invalid' help: run `x.py check --help --verbose` to show a list of available paths note: if you are adding a new Step to bootstrap itself, make sure you register it with `describe!` ```
… r=Mark-Simulacrum update `jemallocator` example to use 2018 edition import syntax
Fix an ICE on rust-lang#96738 In the block we don't know if the method actually exists thus `expect_local` panics. Fixes rust-lang#96738 Fixes rust-lang#96583
…-bsd, r=Mark-Simulacrum bootstrap: bsd platform flags for split debuginfo Addresses rust-lang#96597 (comment). Bootstrap currently provides `-Zunstable-options` for OpenBSD when using split debuginfo - this commit provides it for all BSD targets. We should probably work out a better way of handling the stability of the split debuginfo flag - all options for the flag are unstable but one of them is the default for each platform already. cc `@m-ou-se` r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…-take-2, r=petrochenkov Remove closures on `expect_local` to apply `#[track_caller]` Pointed out in rust-lang#96747 (comment) Didn't change `expect_non_local` as I'm not sure if it's also the case. r? ``@petrochenkov``
…nstable_book, r=ehuss Fix an incorrect link in The Unstable Book https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_session/lint/builtin.rs returns page not found. The following is the background of the move. First rust-lang#74862 moves from src/librustc_session/lint/builtin.rs to compiler/rustc_session/src/lint/builtin.rs. Then rust-lang@23018a5 moves from compiler/rustc_session/src/lint/builtin.rs to compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs. So, the current correct link is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs. This PR fixes a broken link on the following page: https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/plugin.html
…er-errors Link to correct issue in issue-95034 known-bug fix a typo is issue number: 94034 -> 95034
…=compiler-errors Add regression test for rust-lang#96319
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
|
📌 Commit fe52669 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced May 7, 2022
|
Finished benchmarking commit (36aa7c1): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
jemallocatorexample to use 2018 edition import syntax #96701 (updatejemallocatorexample to use 2018 edition import syntax)expect_localto apply#[track_caller]#96778 (Remove closures onexpect_localto apply#[track_caller])Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup