Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #98123

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 15, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #98123

merged 17 commits into from
Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 17 commits June 7, 2022 01:08
This avoids the name clash with `rustc_serialize::Encoder` (a trait),
and allows lots qualifiers to be removed and imports to be simplified
(e.g. fewer `as` imports).

(This was previously merged as commit 5 in rust-lang#94732 and then was reverted
in rust-lang#97905 because of a perf regression caused by commit 4 in rust-lang#94732.)
...since slice sizes can't signed wrap

see https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/fn.from_raw_parts.html

> The total size len * mem::size_of::<T>() of the slice must be no larger than isize::MAX.
…-intrinsics, r=oli-obk

Filter out intrinsics if we have other import candidates to suggest

Fixes rust-lang#97618

Also open to just sorting these candidates to be last. Pretty easy to modify the code to do that, too.
Move some tests to more reasonable directories

r? ```@petrochenkov```
compiler: remove unused deps

Removed unused dependencies in compiler crates and moves few `libc` under `target.cfg(unix)` .
…rochenkov

Use unchecked mul to compute slice sizes

This allows LLVM to realize that `slice.len() > 0` iff `slice.len() * size_of::<T>() > 0`, allowing a branch on the latter to be folded into the former when dropping vecs and boxed slices, in some cases.

Fixes (partially) rust-lang#96497
Rename rustc_serialize::opaque::Encoder as MemEncoder.

This avoids the name clash with `rustc_serialize::Encoder` (a trait),
and allows lots qualifiers to be removed and imports to be simplified
(e.g. fewer `as` imports).

(This was previously merged as commit 5 in rust-lang#94732 and then was reverted
in rust-lang#97905 because of a perf regression caused by commit 4 in rust-lang#94732.)

r? ```@bjorn3```
…, r=oli-obk

Suggest adding a `#[macro_export]` to a private macro

fixes rust-lang#97628
…ompiler-errors

Fix misspelling of "constraint" as "contraint"

I misspelled a function name a while back
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 15, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=7 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 15, 2022

📌 Commit 1b8fc2f has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 15, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 15, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 1b8fc2f with merge 389352c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 15, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing 389352c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 15, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 389352c into rust-lang:master Jun 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 15, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (389352c): comparison url.

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
1.8% 2.8% 2
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-3.1% -4.2% 2
All 😿🎉 (primary) 1.8% 2.8% 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

  2. number of relevant changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.