Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removing values.Map from BaseMessage proto as Beholder only supports root level protos #876

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

patrickhuie19
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 commented Oct 22, 2024

Temporary workaround while we are blocked on INFOPLAT-1386

Originally tried to embed values.Map into the proto, but it was very messy. This assumes that all labels will be strings, which is true for the short term.

Supports:

Copy link
Contributor

@vyzaldysanchez vyzaldysanchez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but we need CI working.

@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 merged commit b772997 into main Oct 22, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 deleted the feature/root-level-proto branch October 22, 2024 20:55
patrickhuie19 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
…upports root level protos (#876)"

This reverts commit b772997.
vyzaldysanchez pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
…upports root level protos (#876)" (#881)

This reverts commit b772997.
patrickhuie19 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
…supports root level protos (#876)" (#881)

This reverts commit c5c856e.
patrickhuie19 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
…supports root level protos (#876)" (#881) (#886)

This reverts commit c5c856e.
patrickhuie19 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
…supports root level protos (#876)" (#881) (#886)

This reverts commit c5c856e.

(cherry picked from commit eed6b5f)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants