-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tkn version
reflects pipeline version
#503
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @waveywaves. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@waveywaves: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit misleading , this refer to the library dependency version not the running pipeline version , interesting for tkn cli devs but not really for our users (and mislead the user)
As @chmouel said, it's gonna be misleading and will always be |
@vdemeester @chmouel Yeah that makes sense. It would make more sense to have the version to be exposed via the API or on a label in a namespace becuase it will pick up dev :/ I will try that out instead. |
maybe i am wrong but i don't think there is a way to do with CRDs? |
So far, nope 😓 |
@waveywaves @chmouel @vdemeester how about adding one more end point in pipelines |
It could work indeed 👼 might required some changes in |
Are you updating this @waveywaves ? |
@chmouel Yes I will be updating it right away ! |
fixes #463
Changes
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
make docs
andmake man
if needed.make check
See the contribution guide
for more details.
Release Notes