TEP-0094: Specifying resource requirements at runtime [Problem Statement] #556
Conversation
tekton-robot
added
the
size/M
lbernick
changed the title
|
/kind tep |
tekton-robot
added
the
kind/tep
|
/assign @skaegi |
|
/assign |
lbernick
force-pushed
the
resources
branch
3 times, most recently
from
50487c6 to
4babc84
Compare
tekton-robot
added
the
approved
This TEP addresses tektoncd/pipeline#4080 and tektoncd/pipeline#4326 by proposing new configuration to TaskRuns and PipelineTaskRuns that can override any Step resource requirements specified in a Task or PipelineTask.
|
|
||
| Currently, users can specify resource requirements in a `Task` definition, | ||
| via the `Resources` field of each `Step`, `StepTemplate`, or `Sidecar`. However, there is currently no support | ||
| for modifying these requirements in a `TaskRun` or `PipelineTaskRun`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does PipelineTaskRun mean here? does it refer to PipelineTask? Does it essentially mean modifying requirements in a TaskRun and/or PipelineTask with having reference to a catalog?
Or is it referring to PipelineRun? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a run of a PipelineTask: https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/blob/main/pkg/apis/pipeline/v1beta1/pipelinerun_types.go#L468-L481
The idea is to be able to change resource requirements for a Pipeline within a PipelineRun.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For PipelineTaskRun - I'm guessing this will be the place in the API? https://tekton.dev/docs/pipelines/pipelineruns/#specifying-taskrunspecs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could say in TaskRun (issued from PipelineRuns or one-shot) or something like this, but it's a nit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 to the nit, maybe for a future update - i think it's important to be cautious about introducing new terminology. "pipeline task" is already a bit confusing since this isn't a Tekton type, PipelineTaskRun looks like something I'd expect to be a Tekton type (esp mentioned alongside TaskRun)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sounds good, I will change this in the subsequent pr.
|
|
||
| Currently, users can specify resource requirements in a `Task` definition, | ||
| via the `Resources` field of each `Step`, `StepTemplate`, or `Sidecar`. However, there is currently no support | ||
| for modifying these requirements in a `TaskRun` or `PipelineTaskRun`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For PipelineTaskRun - I'm guessing this will be the place in the API? https://tekton.dev/docs/pipelines/pipelineruns/#specifying-taskrunspecs
|
|
||
| Currently, users can specify resource requirements in a `Task` definition, | ||
| via the `Resources` field of each `Step`, `StepTemplate`, or `Sidecar`. However, there is currently no support | ||
| for modifying these requirements in a `TaskRun` or `PipelineTaskRun`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could say in TaskRun (issued from PipelineRuns or one-shot) or something like this, but it's a nit.
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: afrittoli, bobcatfish, jerop, skaegi, vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This TEP addresses tektoncd/pipeline#4080 and tektoncd/pipeline#4326 by
proposing new configuration to TaskRuns and PipelineTaskRuns that can
override any Step resource requirements specified in a Task or PipelineTask.