-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge pypsa eur sec #484
Merge pypsa eur sec #484
Conversation
test configs: reduce to relative changes CI: use snakemake --configfile options
Integrate linopy as solver framework
Snakefile: retrieve data bundle from pypsaeur function
automatically retrieve technology-data, no git clone
build sequestration: fix input for new snakemake versions
compatibility with technology-data v0.5
I had a rough look at the docs and I think they are nicely structured, thanks @fneum! I would be fine with merging at this point. Bug fixing can be done anyway in the new master. Sidenote: I think it would be good to introduce a |
set default share_cutout: True
… merge-pypsa-eur-sec
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
looks really great @fneum, @FabianHofmann . I had a look at the documentation and tried one electricity only, one sector-coupled and one myopic run, all worked nice and smoothly! |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
… merge-pypsa-eur-sec
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
… merge-pypsa-eur-sec
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
According to our todo list, the only thing missing is the final releases of pypsa-eur(-sec) before merging. However looking at the changes in pypsa-eur since the release, none of it is functional (version fixes, tqdm, cluster wildcard). So I don't even know whether this is necessary. So, I am happy with merging as is anytime :) |
Alright, I agree that we don't need new independent releases before merging because 0.7.0 was very recent and because no functional changes were made since then. Ok, since @lisazeyen, @FabianHofmann, @fneum are happy, and @nworbmot reviewed the docs, let's move ahead! |
Whoop!! |
Closes #463
Closes #450
Closes #613
Closes #612
Checklist