-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
secp256k1-sys: update util.h patch to delete more stdio code #735
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Successfully ran local tests on b66bae7.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK b66bae7
I wonder if upstream maintainers would be open to cleaning this up on their end so that we wouldn't need these potentially-fragile patches. |
I think so -- they have the In this case, they added this code which isn't even used! (Its purpose is to make debugging/development easier.) I'm sure it was just an oversight that it could potentially break no-libc users. |
Needs backport. |
21f67d5 secp256k1-sys: release 0.10.1 (Andrew Poelstra) 1f9f77b secp256k1-sys: update util.h patch to delete more stdio code (Andrew Poelstra) Pull request description: This backports #735. I am PR'ing to the secp256k1-0.29.x branch because this will work and because it feels like unnecessary complication to try to create a secp256k1-sys-0.10.x branch, which might be "more correct" but would make our git tree harder to understand and maintain. As in #735, this just deletes some dead code from secp256k1-sys/depend/secp256k1. ACKs for top commit: Kixunil: ACK 21f67d5 Tree-SHA512: 1b88cf2458250d1454696aabc7c85d76337033ac056deb9416f1487eefb504d01c627849b477f68438cf520242cbdef9de89aadb9dbe9f79c94244ce6c8348bf
We could release a new secp256k1-sys at the same time, but we have made no changes there except to delete a bit of unused code in rust-bitcoin#735, and bump MSRV, so it does not seem worth the extra disruption.
228f98e release secp256k1 0.30.0 (Andrew Poelstra) Pull request description: We could release a new secp256k1-sys at the same time, but we have made no changes there except to delete a bit of unused code in #735, and bump MSRV, so it does not seem worth the extra disruption. ACKs for top commit: tcharding: ACK 228f98e Tree-SHA512: af3d091f8a1a8efa0e38e7d45504b5ccabc73b783a15f26102c92e7a83d1048df27a14e64aae079b523c66004eb9b0ff33495763743b5d18762bc3dfcda00fbd
454a9aa fix: Wasm doesn't build (Christian Lewe) Pull request description: Port of rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1#735 Let's see if this passes CI. I can run `cargo build --target wasm32-unknown-unknown` after my commit. Generating the `.patch` files was kind of hard. Is there an easy way? ACKs for top commit: apoelstra: ACK 454a9aa; successfully ran local tests; thanks!! Tree-SHA512: 84c41aed6ba8a592938e1888fccf0abcc09fc71a052c6616cb6e63f89474f8cf99e65058e07c2c992298cabd5e2fa6d5e7a3a9b3fc1fb14bb13800f8b1c01b00
Fixes #734