Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Suggest using Arc on !Send/!Sync types" #115311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dtolnay
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay commented Aug 28, 2023

Closes #114687. This is a clean revert of #88936 + #115210. The suggestion to Arc<{Self}> when Self does not implement Send is always wrong.

#114842 is considering a way to make a more refined suggestion.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 28, 2023

r? @compiler-errors

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 28, 2023
@dtolnay dtolnay added beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 28, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Yeah, looking through the UI test changes, it really does look like a lot of them are either inactionable (noting some type that's really deep within an opaque, for example) or wrong (Arc<NotSync>)

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 28, 2023

📌 Commit 823bacb has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 28, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#115164 (MIR validation: reject in-place argument/return for packed fields)
 - rust-lang#115240 (codegen_llvm/llvm_type: avoid matching on the Rust type)
 - rust-lang#115294 (More precisely detect cycle errors from type_of on opaque)
 - rust-lang#115310 (Document panic behavior across editions, and improve xrefs)
 - rust-lang#115311 (Revert "Suggest using `Arc` on `!Send`/`!Sync` types")
 - rust-lang#115317 (Devacationize oli-obk)
 - rust-lang#115319 (don't use SnapshotVec in Graph implementation, as it looks unused; use Vec instead)
 - rust-lang#115322 (Tweak output of `to_pretty_impl_header` involving only anon lifetimes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9b0abe3 into rust-lang:master Aug 28, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Aug 28, 2023
@dtolnay dtolnay deleted the usearcself branch August 28, 2023 22:07
@Amanieu Amanieu added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Aug 30, 2023
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2023
@cuviper cuviper modified the milestones: 1.74.0, 1.73.0 Sep 1, 2023
@cuviper cuviper removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Sep 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
[beta] backports

- Contents of reachable statics is reachable rust-lang#115114
- Revert "Suggest using `Arc` on `!Send`/`!Sync` types" rust-lang#115311
- Stop emitting non-power-of-two vectors in (non-portable-SIMD) codegen rust-lang#115236
- Do not forget to pass DWARF fragment information to LLVM. rust-lang#115139
- rustdoc: use unicode-aware checks for redundant explicit link fastpath rust-lang#115070

r? cuviper
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion to use Arc<T> is too indiscriminate
6 participants