Implement Capella upgrade #5680
Assignees
Labels
Epic Capella
Issues required to implement Capella upgrade
Comments
58 tasks
rolfyone
added a commit
to rolfyone/teku
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2022
In order to define Capella configuration, I need to move Bellatrix config into the same kind of structure as Altair, so that I can build on it from there. Partially addresses Consensys#5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
rolfyone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2022
Partially addresses #5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
rolfyone
added a commit
to rolfyone/teku
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2022
Used mainnet file as the basis for gnosis, and minimal as the basis for swift. partially addresses Consensys#5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
rolfyone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2022
partially addresses #5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
rolfyone
added
Epic Capella
rolfyone
added a commit
to rolfyone/teku
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2022
- added the `operations/bls_to_execution_change` group to operations that are supported - added capella fork support partially addresses Consensys#5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
2 tasks
rolfyone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2022
- added the `operations/bls_to_execution_change` group to operations that are supported - added capella fork support partially addresses #5680 Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
14 tasks
bgravenorst
added a commit
to Consensys/doc.teku
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2023
* Drafted a document for withdrawals for capella Hopefully this is a good start for documenting the capella upgrade and what users need to know. I referenced ethdo, which is a tool we don't maintain, but it's also the only tool i know of at the moment that has this functionality... The capella upgrade is not set to release on a specific date yet, but this kind of concept document will start being useful very soon. ref. Consensys/teku#5680 and Consensys/teku#6482 * First pass on editing the content. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Additional edits and structural changes. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Fix vale issues. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * updating submodule to latest * Update common folder. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * updating submodule to latest * updating submodule to latest * Address reviewer feedback. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Minor update. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * typo. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Address reviewer feeedback. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Fix typo. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Add sentence about BLS withdrawal keys. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> * Address comment. Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bgravenorst <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Specification.
Primarily just concerns withdrawals for now. But EIP-4844 is likely to be added in, see #5681.
Spec Config
Spec Logic
P2P Changes
Rest API Changes
Testing
TBC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: