Rollup of 3 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Some small cleanups in rustc_abi #116313 (Some small cleanups in rustc_abi)
• Correct misleading std::fmt::Binary example (#116165) #116326 (Correct misleading std::fmt::Binary example (documentation for fmt binary trait: slightly misleading example #116165))
• skip_binder to instantiate_identity #116340 (skip_binder to instantiate_identity)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

[bors]

📌 Commit cfe9e13 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit cfe9e13 with merge 5ead745...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 5ead745 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#116313	Some small cleanups in rustc_abi	5d4b7ef075711dd8b48832156394af3c3216a89c (link)
#116326	Correct misleading std::fmt::Binary example (#116165)	59b6263d5ddd73e7a400855f9b8b3ef6d2282a8c (link)
#116340	skip_binder to instantiate_identity	8195db976efa7b8c09f39c07b099ee28e0e9ed76 (link)

previous master: b0889cb4ed

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (5ead745): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[4.6%, 4.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-2.2%, 1.2%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.0%	[-2.0%, -2.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.0%	[-2.0%, -2.0%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 628.193s -> 628.136s (-0.01%)
Artifact size: 273.37 MiB -> 273.35 MiB (-0.01%)